首页> 外文学位 >Real-time probabilistic contaminant source identification and model-based event detection algorithms.
【24h】

Real-time probabilistic contaminant source identification and model-based event detection algorithms.

机译:实时概率污染源识别和基于模型的事件检测算法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The development of sensor-based contaminant warning systems (CWS) has extended beyond sensor placement algorithms into forensic algorithms such as event detection algorithms (EDA) and source identification algorithms. The objectives of the current study were focused on the development of a probabilistic contamination source identification algorithm (PCSI), as well as the development and evaluation of both localized and system-wide model-based EDAs. The PCSI algorithm was developed to overcome the limiting assumptions of other source identification algorithms (e.g., known hydraulics, perfect sensors, single injection location). Using the binary signals from a localized EDA, the resulting hydraulic path was traced backward in time and the probabilities of potential sources estimated with two different Bayesian updating procedures - a Beta-Binomial conjugate pair approach and a simpler Bayes' Rule approach. Results showed that the Beta-Binomial approach demonstrated better selectivity than the Bayes' Rule approach. Additionally, the PCSI algorithm was shown capable of accounting for false positive/negative responses as well as providing the flexibility for the successful identification of multiple source locations. Ultimately, CWS design and the performance of forensic tools are dependent on the performance of the EDAs. However, current EDA evaluation approaches do not typically account for transport characteristics within the network and/or the actual changes of common water quality parameters in response to a contaminant. Thus, water quality models were developed to represent the dynamics of chlorine, pH and conductivity in response to two contaminants (KCN and nicotine). The simulation studies demonstrated that current EDA evaluation approaches, as well as CWS design assumptions, may not adequately represent the EDA performance under conditions likely to be observed within a distribution system. These water quality models were also used to evaluate the model-based EDAs developed as part of this study. A model-based localized EDA was proposed to identify the "true" event from background noise by evaluating the likelihood of a series of multivariate error signals using multivariate kernel density estimation with a moving time-window. The evaluation was based on the use of both "synthetic" events as well as simulated water quality dynamics in response to two contaminants (discussed above). The results demonstrated the capabilities of the model-based EDA to detect anomalous events, as well as the significant impacts that network hydraulics and transport can have on EDA performance, which are typically not considered in current EDA evaluation approaches. A system-wide EDA was developed by integrating the binary signals from multiple localized EDAs through the PCSI algorithm with an alarm threshold based on the probability of network contamination. The proposed approach was compared against the performance of a localized system-wide EDA using two different simulated injection scenarios that produced different amounts of sensor information. In general, the results demonstrated that integrating the binary signals from the localized EDA provided better system-wide performance than relying solely on the individual localized EDAs. From a broader perspective, these results suggest that more realistic water quality dynamics should be considered when assessing EDA performance and be utilized to provide meaningful information for the design of sensor-based CWS.
机译:基于传感器的污染物警告系统(CWS)的开发已从传感器放置算法扩展到法医算法,例如事件检测算法(EDA)和源识别算法。当前研究的目标集中在概率污染源识别算法(PCSI)的开发,以及局部和基于系统的基于模型的EDA的开发和评估上。开发PCSI算法是为了克服其他震源识别算法的局限性假设(例如,已知的液压系统,完善的传感器,单次喷射位置)。使用来自局部EDA的二进制信号,可以及时回溯最终的水力路径,并使用两种不同的贝叶斯更新程序-Beta-Binomial共轭对方法和更简单的贝叶斯法则方法来估算潜在来源的概率。结果表明,与贝叶斯规则方法相比,Beta-Binomial方法具有更好的选择性。此外,显示了PCSI算法能够解决错误的肯定/否定响应以及为成功识别多个源位置提供灵活性。最终,CWS的设计和取证工具的性能取决于EDA的性能。然而,当前的EDA评估方法通常不考虑网络内的传输特性和/或响应于污染物的常见水质参数的实际变化。因此,开发了水质模型来代表响应两种污染物(KCN和尼古丁)的氯,pH和电导率的动态变化。仿真研究表明,当前的EDA评估方法以及CWS设计假设可能无法充分代表配电系统中可能观察到的条件下的EDA性能。这些水质模型还用于评估作为本研究的一部分开发的基于模型的EDA。提出了一种基于模型的局部EDA,通过使用带有移动时间窗的多变量内核密度估计来评估一系列多变量误差信号的可能性,从而从背景噪声中识别出“真实”事件。该评估是基于“合成”事件以及响应两种污染物的模拟水质动态(如上所述)的使用。结果表明,基于模型的EDA能够检测异常事件,以及网络水力和运输对EDA性能的重大影响,而当前的EDA评估方法通常不会考虑这些影响。通过将来自多个本地化EDA的二进制信号通过PCSI算法与基于网络污染概率的警报阈值进行集成,开发了一个全系统的EDA。使用两种产生不同数量传感器信息的不同模拟注入方案,将所提出的方法与本地化全系统EDA的性能进行了比较。通常,结果表明,与仅依赖于单个本地化EDA相比,集成来自本地化EDA的二进制信号可提供更好的系统范围的性能。从更广泛的角度来看,这些结果表明,在评估EDA性能时应考虑更现实的水质动态,并为设计基于传感器的CWS提供有意义的信息。

著录项

  • 作者

    Yang, Xueyao.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Cincinnati.;

  • 授予单位 University of Cincinnati.;
  • 学科 Engineering Environmental.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 176 p.
  • 总页数 176
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号