首页> 外文学位 >Interests and ideas: Industrialization and the making of early American trade policy, 1789 - 1860.
【24h】

Interests and ideas: Industrialization and the making of early American trade policy, 1789 - 1860.

机译:兴趣和观点:工业化和美国早期贸易政策的制定,1789年-1860年。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Trade policy was a prominent economic and political issue in the United States between 1789 and 1860, culminating in the Civil War. Many historians have characterized this period as pitting mutually exclusive economic systems, an industrializing, free-labor North and a slave-based agricultural South, against one another. The traditional interpretation is that the North eagerly supported tariffs and economic protection that they provided, while the South stood in opposition. The Nullification Crisis of 1832-1833 is frequently cited as evidence that the tariff was a sectional issue and some historians go so far as to describe the tariff as a significant cause of the Civil War.;This traditional view of early American trade policy merits reconsideration. The First Industrial Revolution, rather than competing labor systems, provides the appropriate context through which antebellum trade policy ought to be viewed and understood. An examination of congressional roll call votes on important trade policy legislation, coupled with economic census data, provides compelling evidence that the tariff was national in scope, pitting economic nationalists, who supported protective principles, against liberals, who supported free trade. By the time of the Civil War, the tariff issue was clearly not demarcated by geographical region.;The debates over trade policy before the Civil War were dynamic, and highly influenced by interests and ideas. As industrialization spread throughout the United States, local economic interests were susceptible to change, which were manifested through the votes of elected legislators. Likewise, ideas played an important role, as Americans debated the respective merits of a strong national policy to serve the community-at-large through national military and economic strength versus a desire for an egalitarian approach involving minimal federal government involvement.;The American trade policy debate was sectional in nature for a brief period between 1824 and 1833. Prior to that time, trade policy was shaped by foreign relations. By 1824 the First Industrial Revolution had commenced in the United States, though it was limited to the northeastern part of the nation. Between 1824 and 1833 there were bitter debates over the tariff, caused by the industrialization had been introduced to part, but not all, of the nation. However, by the 1830s other portions of the country, including the South, began experiencing an industrialization "takeoff" process. An examination of various tariff bills in 1841 and 1842, when subjected to statistical modeling, demonstrates that the relationship between capital investment in manufactures per capita for a political unit (congressional district or state) and the trade policy voting pattern of its senators or representatives was significant. In comparison, geographical region and slave population were not significant factors.;By the time of the tariffs of 1841 and 1842, trade policy was again a national issue and it remained so up to the Civil War. Economic interests and ideas, shaped by the Industrial Revolution, were the factors that most profoundly shaped antebellum American trade policy.
机译:贸易政策在1789年至1860年间是美国一个突出的经济和政治问题,最终以内战告终。许多历史学家将这一时期定为相互排斥的经济体系,一个工业化的,自由劳动的北方和一个以奴隶为基础的农业南方相互抵制。传统的解释是,朝鲜热切支持关税和经济保护,而南方则反对。人们经常引用1832-1833年的“消亡危机”作为证据,证明关税是一个分部问题,一些历史学家甚至认为关税是内战的重要原因。这种对美国早期贸易政策的传统看法值得重新考虑。 。第一次工业革命,而不是竞争性的劳动力制度,提供了适当的背景,通过该背景应可以观察和理解战前贸易政策。对国会关于重要贸易政策立法的唱名表决进行的审查,再加上经济普查数据,提供了令人信服的证据,表明关税是全国范围的关税,与支持保护性原则的经济民族主义者,支持自由贸易的自由主义者相对立。在内战时期,关税问题显然没有按地理区域划分。内战之前有关贸易政策的辩论是充满活力的,并且受到利益和思想的影响很大。随着工业化遍及美国,地方经济利益容易发生变化,这通过民选议员的投票得以体现。同样,思想也起着重要的作用,因为美国人辩论了通过国家军事和经济实力服务于广大社区的强有力的国家政策的优点,以及对联邦政府介入最少的平等主义方法的渴望。在1824年至1833年之间的短暂时间里,政策辩论本质上是分段的。在此之前,贸易政策是由外交关系决定的。到1824年,第一次工业革命在美国开始,尽管它仅限于美国东北部。在1824年至1833年之间,由于部分国家(但不是全部)引入了由工业化引起的关税的激烈辩论。但是,到1830年代,包括南方在内的美国其他地区开始经历工业化的“腾飞”过程。在对1841年和1842年的各种关税法案进行统计模型分析后,发现一个政治单位(国会区或州)的人均制造业资本投资与参议员或代表的贸易政策投票方式之间的关系是重大。相比之下,地理区域和奴隶人口并不是重要因素。到1841年和1842年加征关税之时,贸易政策再次成为国家事务,直到南北战争为止。受工业革命影响的经济利益和思想是最深刻影响美国战前贸易政策的因素。

著录项

  • 作者

    Moore, John Austin.;

  • 作者单位

    Wayne State University.;

  • 授予单位 Wayne State University.;
  • 学科 History United States.;Economics History.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 559 p.
  • 总页数 559
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号