首页> 外文学位 >Controlling Type I error rate in evaluating Differential Item Functioning for four DIF methods: Use of three procedures for adjustment of multiple item testing.
【24h】

Controlling Type I error rate in evaluating Differential Item Functioning for four DIF methods: Use of three procedures for adjustment of multiple item testing.

机译:在评估四种不同方法的差异项功能时,控制I型错误率:使用三种过程来调整多项测试。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In DIF studies, a Type I error refers to the mistake of identifying non-DIF items as DIF items, and a Type I error rate refers to the proportion of Type I errors in a simulation study. The possibility of making a Type I error in DIF studies is always present and high possibility of making such an error can weaken the validity of the assessment. Therefore, the quality of a test assessment is related to a Type I error rate and to how to control such a rate. Current DIF studies regarding a Type I error rate have found that the latter rate can be affected by several factors, such as test length, sample size, test group size, group mean difference, group standard deviation difference, and an underlying model. This study focused on another undiscovered factor that may affect a Type I error rate; the effect of multiple testing.;DIF analysis conducts multiple significance testing of items in a test, and such multiple testing may increase the possibility of making a Type I error at least once. The main goal of this dissertation was to investigate how to control a Type I error rate using adjustment procedures for multiple testing which have been widely used in applied statistics but rarely used in DIF studies.;In the simulation study, four DIF methods were performed under a total of 36 testing conditions; the methods were the Mantel-Haenszel method, the logistic regression procedure, the Differential Functioning Item and Test framework, and the Lord's chi-square test. Then the Bonferroni correction, the Holm's procedure, and the BH method were applied as an adjustment of multiple significance testing. The results of this study showed the effectiveness of three adjustment procedures in controlling a Type I error rate.
机译:在DIF研究中,I类错误是指将非DIF项目标识为DIF项目的错误,I类错误率是指模拟研究中I类错误的比例。在DIF研究中始终存在发生I型错误的可能性,而发生此类错误的可能性很高,可能会削弱评估的有效性。因此,测试评估的质量与I型错误率以及如何控制这种错误率有关。当前关于I型错误率的DIF研究发现,后者的错误率可能会受到多种因素的影响,例如测试长度,样本量,测试组大小,组均值差,组标准差和基本模型。这项研究的重点是另一个可能影响I型错误率的因素。 DIF分析对测试中的项目进行了多显着性测试,并且这种多次测试可能会增加至少发生一次I型错误的可能性。本论文的主要目的是研究如何通过多次测试的调整程序来控制I型错误率,这些调整程序已在应用统计中广泛使用,但很少用于DIF研究中。共有36个测试条件;这些方法包括Mantel-Haenszel方法,逻辑回归程序,差分功能项和测试框架以及Lord的卡方检验。然后将Bonferroni校正,Holm程序和BH方法应用于多显着性检验的调整。这项研究的结果显示了三种调整程序在控制I型错误率方面的有效性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kim, Jihye.;

  • 作者单位

    Georgia State University.;

  • 授予单位 Georgia State University.;
  • 学科 Educational tests measurements.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 160 p.
  • 总页数 160
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:37:06

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号