首页> 外文学位 >The implications of mainstreaming sustainable development: A study of civilized ecological villages in Hainan, China.
【24h】

The implications of mainstreaming sustainable development: A study of civilized ecological villages in Hainan, China.

机译:可持续发展主流化的意义:中国海南文明生态村庄研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Evidence of China's looming ecological crisis coupled with concerns of increasing rural-urban socio-economic differentiation have generated interest in rural sustainable development in China. A lens of ecological modernity directs Chinese sustainable development efforts towards a reliance on technological and industrial innovations to solve environmental problems. This orientation toward engineering and technological interventions is exemplified in the Chinese ecological village model of sustainable development. Chinese ecological villages are founded on the principles of ecological engineering and strive to foster forms of development which are environmentally more preferable than extant forms of rural development in the Chinese countryside that rely on industrialization. Hainan is one of the first provinces in China to mainstream the ecological village model by launching a rural development program that aims to convert the majority of villages into civilized ecological ones. The implications of using models to plan rural sustainable development initiatives within a top-down, government controlled planning context such as China, has not been well documented.;An institutional context based on top-down planning enabled government officials to unilaterally determine the development agenda in accordance with government notions of progress and modernity. Chinese notions of sustainability grounded in ecological modernity and ideological notions of 'civilization' directed efforts to promote sustainable development in the Chinese countryside towards technology transfer and infrastructure improvement. Rather than becoming vehicles for sustainable development which empower rural populations to become active agents in the development process, a reliance on blue-prints and models of built form served to reinforce government control in the Chinese countryside.;The purpose of this study is to assess the implications of mainstreaming the civilized ecological village model as a means of promoting sustainable development in the Chinese countryside. A qualitative case study approach was used to examine local perspectives and experiences with the development of two civilized ecological villages in Sanya City, Hainan. The study suggests that a reliance on substantive models of built form can be problematic in mainstreaming sustainable development initiatives in China. As the ecological village model was mainstreamed, the top-down planning approach enabled a substantive re-orientation of the model in accordance with government objectives. The planning approach imposed government priorities on rural villages and led to a focus on tangible outputs and the construction of infrastructure, such as roads. Rather than promoting ecological protection, the 'ecological' component of the civilized ecological villages centred on constructing a clean and ordered built village environment. Moreover, the model inserted an ideologically motivated agenda into rural villages by attempting to foster 'civilized' rural customs and culture.
机译:中国迫在眉睫的生态危机以及对城乡社会经济差异不断加剧的担忧,引起了人们对中国农村可持续发展的兴趣。生态现代性的镜头引导中国的可持续发展努力依靠技术和工业创新来解决环境问题。对工程和技术干预的这种取向在中国可持续发展的生态村模型中得到了体现。中国的生态村是建立在生态工程原理的基础上的,它致力于促进发展形式,这些发展形式在环境上比依赖工业化的中国农村现存的农村发展形式更为可取。通过启动一项旨在将大多数村庄转变为文明生态村庄的乡村发展计划,海南是中国最早将生态村庄模式纳入主流的省份之一。在自上而下,由政府控制的规划背景下,使用模型来规划农村可持续发展计划的含义尚未得到充分证明。;基于自上而下的规划的制度背景使政府官员能够单方面确定发展议程按照政府关于进步和现代性的观念。中国基于生态现代性的可持续发展理念和“文明”的意识形态理念旨在推动中国农村地区的可持续发展,以实现技术转让和基础设施改善。对蓝图和建筑形式模型的依赖不是加强可持续发展的手段以使农村人口在发展过程中成为积极的推动者,而是加强了对中国农村的政府控制。文明的生态乡村模式主流化作为促进中国农村可持续发展的手段的意义。采用定性案例研究的方法,考察了海南三亚市两个文明生态村发展的当地观点和经验。研究表明,在中国将可持续发展计划纳入主流时,依赖建筑形式的实体模型可能会出现问题。随着生态村模式的主流化,自上而下的规划方法使模型能够根据政府目标进行实质性调整。该规划方法将政府的优先事项强加于农村,并导致了对有形产出和道路等基础设施建设的关注。文明生态村庄的“生态”部分不是促进生态保护,而是以建设清洁有序的村庄环境为中心。此外,该模型通过尝试培养“文明的”农村风俗和文化,将具有意识形态动机的议程插入乡村。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bundale, Avril Heather.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Waterloo (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Waterloo (Canada).;
  • 学科 Political Science General.;Political Science Public Administration.
  • 学位 M.E.S.
  • 年度 2006
  • 页码 186 p.
  • 总页数 186
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号