首页> 外文学位 >The im/possibility of democracy: Derrida and Habermas.
【24h】

The im/possibility of democracy: Derrida and Habermas.

机译:民主的不可能/可能性:德里达和哈贝马斯。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Jacques Derrida's and Jurgen Habermas's philosophical interventions into contemporary democracy are used to address issues presented by post-national democracy and the possibilities for transforming international law and institutions to confront the dilemmas and pathologies of globalization. Chapter 1 argues that Derrida and Habermas are united by thinking with and against Immanuel Kant in order to rethink reason in an ethical relation to the other, and also to reconceive freedom more substantively, by acknowledging both its legal and material requirements and limits. Chapter 2 analyzes Habermas's discourse theory of democracy, while chapter 3 discusses Derrida's democracy to come. After considering the relation of Derrida and Habermas to the history of democracy, Enlightenment political theory and practice, and their own debate and rapprochement, and then separately surveying their respective political-theoretical ideas, chapters 4 and 5 once again take up Derrida and Habermas together to consider what they have to say regarding the future of democracy. In addition to considering the possibility of a hybrid critical theory based on Derridean deconstruction and Habermas's view of philosophy as reconstructive science, chapter 4 explores several issues concerning the contemporary nation-state and democratic sovereignty, including republican foundationalism, multiculturalism, political pluralism, and the public sphere. Chapter 5 addresses possible solutions to some of the questions presented by the global movement of capital and the attendant diminishing problem-solving capacities of the nation-state---issues of globalization and post-nationalism---and Derrida's and Habermas's positions on the potential for regional and global democratic institutions premised on Kant's conception of a cosmopolitan legal order.
机译:雅克·德里达(Jacques Derrida)和哈尔马斯(Jurgen Habermas)对当代民主的哲学干预,被用来解决后国家民主提出的问题,以及改变国际法和体制以应对全球化的困境和病态的可能性。第一章认为,德里达和哈贝马斯是通过与伊曼纽尔·康德(Immanuel Kant)相互思考和反对而团结起来的,以便通过承认其法律和物质要求与限制,在与他人的伦理关系中重新思考理性,并从实质上重新认识自由。第2章分析了哈贝马斯的民主话语理论,而第3章则讨论了德里达即将来临的民主。在考虑了德里达和哈贝马斯与民主史,启蒙运动的政治理论和实践以及他们自己的辩论和和解的关系,然后分别考察了各自的政治理论思想之后,第4章和第5章再次讨论了德里达和哈贝马斯考虑他们对民主的未来要说些什么。除了考虑基于德里达解构主义和哈贝马斯的哲学作为重建科学的混合批判理论的可能性外,第四章还探讨了与当代民族国家和民主主权有关的几个问题,包括共和主义基础主义,多元文化主义,政治多元主义和社会主义。公共区域。第五章讨论了全球资本流动以及随之而来的民族国家问题解决能力下降的一些问题的可能解决方案-全球化和后民族主义-以及德里达和哈贝马斯的立场。区域和全球民主机构的潜力以康德的国际大都会法律秩序为前提。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    Villanova University.;

  • 授予单位 Villanova University.;
  • 学科 Law.;Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 497 p.
  • 总页数 497
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:36:42

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号