首页> 外文学位 >A comparative study of second molar impaction rates in patients treated with and without lip bumper therapy.
【24h】

A comparative study of second molar impaction rates in patients treated with and without lip bumper therapy.

机译:接受和不接受护唇治疗的患者第二磨牙影响率的比较研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background and significance. Lip bumpers have been proposed as a way to increase arch length. Studies in the literature describe well, their effect on mandibular incisors and first molars. Molars tend to tip back from 2.2° to 8.0° and incisors tend to tip forward 2.4° to 5.2°. In addition, significant increases are made to the mandibular transverse dental dimensions when a lip bumper is used.;Methods. 165 patient chart records were used in this study. An experimental group of 97 lip bumper treated patients were evaluated for mandibular second molar impaction during the course of their treatment. The thirteen patients in the experimental group whose mandibular second molars were impacted and thirteen randomly selected experimental group patients without second molar impactions had three measurements made on their pretreatment panoramic radiographs. Measurements were made between mandibular first and second molars for intermolar angulation, intermolar distance, and second molar distance to the occlusal plane. A control group of 56 patients treated orthodonfically without a lip bumper were also evaluated for mandibular second molar impaction during the course of their treatment.;Results. Class I experimental patients and class I control patients had no statistically significant difference in second molar impaction rate. Class II experimental patients and class II control patients also had no statistically significant difference in second molar impaction rate. Intermolar angulation, intermolar distance, and distance to occlusion measurements showed no statistically significant difference for the subcategories of each measurement between impacted and non-impacted teeth.;Conclusions. In this study, lip bumper therapy did not lead to a statistically significant increased number of mandibular second molar impactions when compared to a similar group of orthodontic patients treated without lip bumper therapy. Panoramic radiograph measurements of the distance and angulation between the mandibular first and second molars, and the distance to occlusion were not statistically different between subcategories of these measurements for impacted and non-impacted teeth.;Purpose. This study aimed to examine if there was an increase in mandibular second molar impaction rate with early use of a lip bumper. As a secondary purpose, this study attempted to evaluate some parameters that might assist the clinician when using a lip bumper if there might be an increase risk of mandibular second molar impaction.
机译:背景和意义。唇形保险杠已被建议作为增加牙弓长度的一种方法。文献研究很好地描述了它们对下颌切牙和第一磨牙的影响。臼齿的倾角通常从2.2°倾斜至8.0°,而门牙的倾角则倾向于2.4°至5.2°。另外,当使用唇缓冲器时,下颌横向牙齿的尺寸显着增加。在这项研究中使用了165个患者图表记录。实验组的97名接受护唇治疗的患者在治疗过程中接受了下颌第二磨牙的撞击评估。实验组的13例下颌第二磨牙受累,随机选择的13例没有第二磨牙的实验组患者在治疗前的全景X线照片上进行了3次测量。在下颌第一磨牙和第二磨牙之间进行磨牙间角度,磨牙间距离和至咬合面的第二磨牙距离的测量。在治疗过程中,还对对照组56例正畸治疗而未使用护唇器的患者进行了下颌第二磨牙的撞击评估。 I类实验患者和I类对照患者的第二磨牙影响率无统计学差异。 II类实验患者和II类对照患者的第二磨牙影响率也无统计学差异。磨牙间角度,磨牙间距离和咬合距离的测量显示,在受影响和未受影响的牙齿之间,每种测量的子类别均无统计学上的显着差异。在这项研究中,与未进行唇部撞击治疗的一组正畸患者相比,唇部撞击治疗并未导致统计学上显着增加的下颌第二磨牙撞击次数。下颌第一和第二磨牙之间的距离和成角度的全景射线照相测量值以及到咬合的距离在这些测量值的子类别之间对于受累和未受累牙齿均无统计学差异。这项研究的目的是检查在早期使用护唇器时下颌第二磨牙的影响率是否增加。作为次要目的,本研究尝试评估一些参数,如果可能增加下颌第二磨牙的患病风险,则在使用护唇器时可能有助于临床医生使用。

著录项

  • 作者

    LeMert, Shawn.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Louisville.;

  • 授予单位 University of Louisville.;
  • 学科 Health Sciences Dentistry.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 43 p.
  • 总页数 43
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:40:26

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号