首页> 外文学位 >All necessary means, all necessary measures: The United Nations and the authorization of the use of force in the 21st century.
【24h】

All necessary means, all necessary measures: The United Nations and the authorization of the use of force in the 21st century.

机译:所有必要的手段,所有必要的措施:联合国与21世纪使用武力的授权。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The problem that this study considers is whether the contingencies of the use of force authorization, as expressed in U.N. Charter system, is effective in meeting the emerging and evolving global security threats of the 21 st century. This study looks at the problem by posing the question in specific terms: do new global security threats and challenges require changes in the way that the use of force is authorized under the current paradigm? In light of the experiences following the end of the Cold War, and particularly since the 9-11 terrorist attacks, the question is significant, timely, and relevant.; This study uses a qualitative method approach and looks at the specific question through two lenses. First, it considers several aspects of the authorization of the use of force, including the Charter system, new global security threats, the challenges posed by the notions of responsibility to protect and the doctrine of preemptive action, and United Nations reform efforts. Second, it considers these aspects by comparing them with a data assessment. This data assessment, based on a series of interviews with surveyed foreign policy elites in the U.S, the U.N., and the E.U, uses an interview questionnaire, posing a series of inquiries, which resulted in qualitative data. The assessment tests the proposed question against the overall assessment findings.; Major findings from this study include recognition of a relatively broad range of positions on the spectrum of the current framework on using force in the 21st century. There is also a general acknowledgment of new global security threats and challenges to the existing use framework and paradigm. Other significant findings include recognition of widespread support for a responsibility to protect exception, while at the same time, a wide-ranging rejection of the doctrine of preemption and preventive war. Finally, there is a common consensus for change in the structure and organization of the U.N. Charter system's authorization of the use of force to manage these new global security threats and challenges.
机译:这项研究考虑的问题是,如联合国宪章制度所表达的那样,使用武力授权的偶然性是否能有效应对21世纪正在出现和发展中的全球安全威胁。这项研究通过具体提出问题来解决这个问题:新的全球安全威胁和挑战是否需要改变当前范式下授权使用武力的方式?根据冷战结束后的经验,特别是自9-11恐怖袭击以来的经验,这个问题是重要,及时和相关的。这项研究使用定性方法,并通过两个视角研究了具体问题。首先,它考虑了授权使用武力的几个方面,包括《宪章》制度,新的全球安全威胁,保护责任的概念和先发制人主义以及联合国的改革努力所带来的挑战。其次,它通过将它们与数据评估进行比较来考虑这些方面。这项数据评估基于对美国,联合国和欧盟的外交政策精英进行的一系列访谈,它使用访谈问卷进行了一系列查询,从而得出了定性数据。评估将建议的问题与总体评估结果进行比较。这项研究的主要发现包括承认在21世纪使用武力的当前框架范围内相对广泛的立场。人们也普遍认识到新的全球安全威胁和对现有使用框架和范例的挑战。其他重大发现包括承认广泛支持保护例外的责任,与此同时,广泛反对先发制人和预防战争的学说。最后,就联合国宪章制度授权使用武力来管理这些新的全球安全威胁和挑战的结构和组织的变化达成共识。

著录项

  • 作者

    Becker, John David.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Denver.;

  • 授予单位 University of Denver.;
  • 学科 Law.; Political Science General.; Political Science International Law and Relations.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 168 p.
  • 总页数 168
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 法律;政治理论;国际法;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:40:20

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号