首页> 外文学位 >Rural community participation in tourism development: Cases from Hainan Province, China.
【24h】

Rural community participation in tourism development: Cases from Hainan Province, China.

机译:乡村社区参与旅游业发展:以中国海南省为例。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Western academics have long recommended community participation in planning as one most important element to induce an equitable distribution of development benefits. However, its implementation at destinations with different political, socio-cultural or economic conditions is hard to guarantee. Furthermore, it is useful to make a distinction between participating in planning and participating in development to share in the benefits; either of which can theoretically occur as means or end in development. Based on literature, a Participatory Spiral is presented as an hypothesis suggesting that planning for disadvantaged social groups' participation in development may be initiated through benefit-sharing, gradually proceeding to shared decision making and planning. It is expected that people will become more and more capable through participating in benefit-sharing activities and then their interest in and capacity to participate in decision making will increase. Moreover, the hypothetical spiral suggests that the planning process may be viewed as having several stages. Initially, those receiving the negative influences of development as "impactees" might first become "beneficiaries" through the provision of compensation for losses and by involving them in various activities to share in the benefits. Local capacities may then become strengthened and participation may be enhanced so that the "beneficiaries" become "clients" who have more initiative and control over development. Eventually they may become "owners" of development interventions. This does not mean that they actually "own" everything, rather it means that they can collectively exercise the right to determine decisions that affect their lives.; This study examines the hypothesis at four rural communities in different ethnicities in a tourism development context at Hainan Province, China and explores the initial stimulus, current level and future trend of participation in tourism development among rural communities which successfully participate in tourism development. The fieldwork was conducted in 2005, using methods of literature review, participatory research, survey, key-informant interview, face-to-face interview and on-site observation.; The research verifies that participation in development should be planned in stages. Furthermore, it supports the principle that initial planning should promote sharing in benefits. Once capacities have been strengthened, shared decision making may then be considered. It is suggested that the spiral model adopted in the study as theoretical hypothesis has great instructional significance. Many outside factors, however, can influence the continual improvement of community participation toward a sharing decision-making end. Therefore, as a theoretical model, it must be acknowledged that such a complicated social phenomenon as community participation in development cannot be successfully reduced to simple spiral model. However, the research results do show that the participation of rural community's in sharing the benefits of development as "beneficiaries" can be promoted successfully in previously poor villages. The concept is easy to be accepted and understood by traditional decision makers and by the rural people themselves. Research also provides hints that some communities might become "clients" if current progress continues and more outside assistance is provided. On the other hand, rural people and traditional decision makers generally lack understanding about the concept of sharing decision-making power and do not ascribe great importance to it. Even so, some actions occurred in the Ya Zi and Dong Yu cases suggesting that people's concerns could be collected and considered in making decisions. Such embryonic initiatives could eventually become a small-scale process of consultation focusing on specific issues and carried out by the traditional decision makers. Furthermore, the study does not verify the whole spiral process d
机译:长期以来,西方学者一直建议社区参与规划是促使公平分配发展利益的最重要因素。但是,很难保证在具有不同政治,社会文化或经济条件的目的地实施该政策。此外,区分参与计划和参与发展以分享利益是有用的;从理论上讲,这两种方法都可以作为一种手段出现或最终发展。根据文献,提出了“参与式螺旋”作为假设,这表明可以通过利益共享来启动对处境不利的社会群体参与发展的计划,然后逐步进行共同的决策和计划。预计人们将通过参与利益共享活动而变得越来越有能力,然后他们对参与决策的兴趣和能力将增加。此外,假设螺旋式表明计划过程可能被视为具有多个阶段。最初,那些受到发展的负面影响而成为“受影响者”的人可能首先通过提供损失赔偿并使他们参与各种活动以分享利益而成为“受益者”。这样就可以增强当地的能力,增强参与度,使“受益者”成为对发展有更多主动权和控制权的“客户”。最终,他们可能成为发展干预措施的“所有者”。这并不意味着他们实际上“拥有”了一切,而是意味着他们可以集体行使决定影响其生活的决定的权利。本研究考察了中国海南省在旅游业发展背景下不同种族的四个农村社区的假设,并探讨了成功参与旅游业发展的农村社区参与旅游业发展的最初动力,当前水平和未来趋势。现场调查于2005年进行,采用文献回顾,参与性研究,调查,关键信息访谈,面对面访谈和现场观察的方法。研究证实,应该分阶段计划参与发展。此外,它支持初步计划应促进利益共享的原则。一旦能力得到加强,便可以考虑共同决策。提示研究中采用的螺旋模型作为理论假设具有重要的指导意义。但是,许多外部因素可能会影响社区参与的持续改善,从而达到共享决策的目的。因此,作为一种理论模型,必须承认,不能将社区参与发展等复杂的社会现象成功地简化为简单的螺旋模型。但是,研究结果确实表明,可以在以前的贫困村庄成功地促进农村社区作为“受益者”分享发展利益。这个概念很容易被传统的决策者和农村人民自己接受和理解。研究还暗示,如果当前的进展持续下去,并且提供更多的外部援助,则某些社区可能会成为“客户”。另一方面,农村人民和传统的决策者通常对共享决策权的概念缺乏理解,也没有将其赋予很高的重要性。即便如此,在“雅滋”案和“东瑜”案中仍发生了一些行动,这表明人们的担忧可以在做出决策时加以考虑。此类萌芽举措最终可能会变成由特定决策者进行,针对特定问题的小型协商过程。此外,该研究并未验证整个螺旋过程d

著录项

  • 作者

    Wang, Yang.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Waterloo (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Waterloo (Canada).;
  • 学科 Recreation.; Urban and Regional Planning.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2006
  • 页码 433 p.
  • 总页数 433
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 群众文化事业;区域规划、城乡规划;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:40:23

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号