首页> 外文学位 >Proportional representation or plurality voting electoral system: Its positive and negative aspects on democracy.
【24h】

Proportional representation or plurality voting electoral system: Its positive and negative aspects on democracy.

机译:比例代表制或多元投票制:民主的正面和负面方面。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Free and fair elections are crucial elements for defining democracy. Fair elections will have to represent voters' true intent in the sense of proportionality between the votes gained in the election and the seats obtained in parliament. My project compares both the Majoritarian model and the Consensus model of democracy in terms of their electoral fairness. I ask the fundamental question: Which of the two systems promotes fairness and legitimacy in the electoral process? Most scholars have looked at this issue from different perspectives. Thus far, no study exists which explores both systems (Majoritarian and Consensus) from a fairness perspective. I argue that the Consensus model combined with low levels of electoral disproportionality should determine the fairness of the system and with that higher level of voter turnout on the elections. The findings affirm my expectations that fairness of the system is strongly correlated with the higher voter turnout.
机译:自由公正的选举是定义民主的关键要素。在选举中获得的选票与议会中获得的席位之间成比例的意义上,公平选举必须代表选民的真正意图。我的项目在选举公平性方面比较了民主的多数派模式和共识模式。我要问一个基本问题:这两个系统中的哪一个在选举过程中促进了公平和合法性?大多数学者从不同的角度看待这个问题。迄今为止,还没有研究从公平的角度探讨两种制度(君主制和共识)。我认为,共识模型与较低水平的选举不成比例相结合,应该确定系统的公平性以及较高的选民投票率。调查结果肯定了我的期望,即该系统的公平性与较高的选民投票率密切相关。

著录项

  • 作者

    Okolik, Martin.;

  • 作者单位

    Arkansas State University.;

  • 授予单位 Arkansas State University.;
  • 学科 Political Science General.
  • 学位 M.A.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 87 p.
  • 总页数 87
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号