首页> 外文学位 >Parties' responses to globalization: What is left for the left and right for the right? A quantitative analysis and the cases of Austria and Germany.
【24h】

Parties' responses to globalization: What is left for the left and right for the right? A quantitative analysis and the cases of Austria and Germany.

机译:缔约方对全球化的反应:左为左,右为右?定量分析以及奥地利和德国的案例。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

How does the international economy influence parties' ideological positions on economic policies? Do social democratic parties face a crisis in light of neoliberal pressures, as suggested by the globalization literature? How do right-wing parties respond to economic openness? Does economic openness entail policy convergence between the left and the right? To answer these questions, the dissertation examines the impact of economic internationalization on the policy programs of Europe's left-wing and right-wing political parties both quantitatively and qualitatively. The quantitative analysis of parties' platforms, which employs data published by the Comparative Manifesto Project, and the qualitative study of Germany's and Austria's mainstream parties reveal that parties indeed systematically adjust their policy positions in response to changes in the degree of economic openness. However, the findings refute arguments of economic policy convergence of left-wing and right-wing parties' positions. Recent developments of Austria's and Germany's parties---some of which are not yet captured by the CMP data---even suggest polarization.The dissertation concludes that policy divergence is in part due to left-wing parties' relative ideological inflexibility and right-wing parties' inclination to embrace market-oriented reforms in response to neoliberal pressures. However, the presence of both centripetal and centrifugal forces within parties, in particular within Germany's parties, indicates that these polarizing trends may yet reverse. This finding is consistent with the hypothesis that parties are more likely to shift rightwards when in government. In this context, it is concluded that the advent of globalization has rendered the tradeoffs between policy and votes more difficult.The dissertation also examines the influence of neoliberal ideology and finds it to be significant. Thus, despite diverging policy positions, policy regimes have shifted to the right. Furthermore, the ascent of neoliberalism has resulted in a rise of intraparty conflict, especially in the case of left-wing parties. Lastly, both quantitative and qualitative analyses confirm that the relative strength of organized labor critically shapes left-wing parties' responses to globalization.
机译:国际经济如何影响各方对经济政策的意识形态立场?正如全球化文献所暗示的那样,社会民主党是否在新自由主义压力下面临危机?右翼政党如何应对经济开放?经济开放是否需要左右之间的政策趋同?为了回答这些问题,本文从数量和质量上考察了经济国际化对欧洲左翼和右翼政党政策方案的影响。使用比较宣言项目发布的数据对政党平台进行的定量分析,以及对德国和奥地利主流政党的定性研究表明,政党确实根据经济开放程度的变化而系统地调整了其政策立场。但是,这些发现驳斥了左翼和右翼政党立场的经济政策趋同的论点。奥地利和德国政党的最新发展-有些尚未被CMP数据捕捉-甚至表明了两极分化。论文的结论是,政策分歧部分是由于左翼政党相对意识形态上的僵化和右倾。翼派倾向响应新自由主义的压力,进行以市场为导向的改革。但是,当事方内部,尤其是德国当事方内部都存在向心力和离心力,这表明这些两极分化的趋势可能还会逆转。这一发现与以下假设相一致:当政党在政党中更有可能向右转移。在此背景下,可以得出结论,全球化的到来使得政策与选票之间的权衡更加困难。本文还考察了新自由主义意识形态的影响,并认为它具有重要意义。因此,尽管政策立场各不相同,但政策制度却向右转移。此外,新自由主义的上升导致党内冲突的增加,特别是在左翼政党的情况下。最后,定量和定性分析都证实,有组织的劳动的相对强度在很大程度上决定了左翼政党对全球化的反应。

著录项

  • 作者

    Haupt, Andrea Beate.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Santa Barbara.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Santa Barbara.;
  • 学科 Political Science General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 360 p.
  • 总页数 360
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:40:09

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号