首页> 外文学位 >Rhetorical Thinking as Dispositional: An Analytical Framework for Teachers.
【24h】

Rhetorical Thinking as Dispositional: An Analytical Framework for Teachers.

机译:作为性格的修辞思维:教师的分析框架。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Since its beginning, modern composition has asked how a writing process understood as a process of inquiry and discovery could be taught systematically. Composition theorists have successfully described the various cognitive and cultural features of this process and the implications of these discoveries for instructional design; however, composition theory lacks a rich description of the interdependence between formal and experiential knowledge when a writer's competence requires flexibility and adaptability. Teachers need a framework which provides an analysis of this interdependence so that they can design classrooms which both transmit essential forms, conventions, and procedures and enculturate students as skilled writers capable of inquiry, discovery, and flexible, adaptable practice. This project uses a theory of thinking as dispositional to describe how formal and experiential knowledge, coupled with judgment and critical perception, are the basis for skillful action in flexible, adaptable practitioners (Perkins, Jay and Tishman 1993).;The dissertation is divided into two parts. The first part identifies the problem of describing rhetorical knowledge for the purposes of educating flexible, adaptable writers. Part One describes three lines of speculation into the cognitive and epistemological dimensions of skillful rhetorical action, Process theory, the Social/post Process critique of process theory and the classical rhetorical arts of invention on modern composition's approach to rhetorical competence. Part Two offers a model of rhetorical thinking as dispositional which accounts for the formal knowledge, informal knowledge, sensitivities and inclinations to learn and act necessary for skillful rhetorical thinking. It proposes a "rhetorical thinking framework" to help teachers describe and define the combination of skills and abilities, sensitivities to occasions for using those skills and abilities, and the inclinations to solve problems that characterize competence. It then analyzes the dispositions involved in skillful use of invention and competence in the use of citation conventions with particular emphasis on technical competence, knowledge of conventions, critical perception and spontaneous action. Finally, the project describes how a view of rhetorical thinking as dispositional changes how the subject matter of writing classes can be expressed instructional design.
机译:从一开始,现代作曲就开始质疑如何系统地教授写作过程,即探究和发现的过程。合成理论家已经成功地描述了这一过程的各种认知和文化特征,以及这些发现对教学设计的意义。然而,当作家的能力要求灵活性和适应性时,构图理论对形式知识和经验知识之间的相互依赖性缺乏详尽的描述。教师需要一个框架来分析这种相互依存关系,以便他们可以设计出既可以传达基本形式,惯例和程序的教室,又可以培养学生作为能够进行探究,发现和灵活,适应性强的实践的熟练作家。该项目使用一种思维理论作为倾向,描述形式知识和经验知识以及判断力和批判性感知是如何在灵活,适应性强的实践者中采取熟练行动的基础(Perkins,Jay和Tishman,1993年)。两个部分。第一部分确定了以教育灵活,适应性强的作家为目的的描述修辞知识的问题。在第一部分中,对技巧性言语行为的认知和认识论维度,过程理论,过程理论的社会/后过程批评以及关于现代组合修辞能力方法的古典发明艺术的描述从三个方面进行了推测。第二部分提供了一种倾向性的修辞思维模型,它说明了正式的知识,非正式的知识,敏感度和学习技巧的技巧和倾向。它提出了一个“修辞思维框架”,以帮助教师描述和定义技能和能力的组合,对使用这些技能和能力的场合的敏感性,以及解决具有能力特征的问题的倾向。然后,它分析了在引用惯例的使用中熟练使用发明和能力所涉及的性情,特别着重于技术能力,惯例知识,批判性感知和自发行动。最后,该项目描述了如何将修辞思维作为一种性格观来改变写作班的主题如何表达教学设计。

著录项

  • 作者

    Danberg, Robert.;

  • 作者单位

    Syracuse University.;

  • 授予单位 Syracuse University.;
  • 学科 Education Language and Literature.;Language Rhetoric and Composition.;Education Instructional Design.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 169 p.
  • 总页数 169
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号