首页> 外文学位 >Determining the value of handwritten comments within work orders.
【24h】

Determining the value of handwritten comments within work orders.

机译:确定工作订单中手写评论的价值。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In the workplace many work orders are handwritten on paper rather than recorded in a digital format. Despite being archived, these documents are neither referenced nor analyzed after their creation. Tacit knowledge gathered though employee documentation is generally considered beneficial, but only if it can be easily gathered and processed.;This study attempted to determine if value exists within these handwritten documents; in this case from a public work organization possessing work orders. As employees make notes in the field, they generate work orders containing free-form handwritten comments. These work orders are brought back and, after their initial review, are no longer used.;To assess these work orders, the researcher created a model that allows an expert panel to systematically assess the value of the handwritten comments. This model followed a recursive procedure in order to form a general consensus. From this consensus, the results were compared to the experts' suggestions of value within an acceptable significance range. The model was also analyzed for repeatability both in a single instance as well as across multiple implementations. Once the prototype system had been tested, a secondary implementation of the instrument was used to further validate the model.;Through a quantitative test and a qualitative survey, the researcher was able to determine that the work order assessment process was valid for this study. The consensus ratings were found to have statistically significant similarities, and this was further strengthened by the feedback from the expert panel. While there was some concern over the cost effectiveness of the survey, the expert panel agreed that the process was generalizable for other topics and repeatable for future implementations.;A quantitative test based on metrics defined by the expert panel revealed that the overall value of the repositories was less than the minimum threshold. Despite a lack of positive results for overall value, the researcher proposed future work and discussed potential areas of study that may still be applicable to the domain of handwritten comments.
机译:在工作场所中,许多工作指令都是手写在纸上,而不是以数字格式记录的。尽管已存档,但在创建这些文档后既未引用也未对其进行分析。通过员工文档收集的隐性知识通常被认为是有益的,但是前提是可以轻松地收集和处理这些隐性知识。本研究试图确定这些手写文档中是否存在价值;在这种情况下,由拥有工单的公共工作组织提供。当员工在现场做笔记时,他们会生成包含自由格式手写注释的工作单。这些工作单被带回,并且在经过初步审查后不再使用。为了评估这些工作单,研究人员创建了一个模型,该模型使专家小组可以系统地评估手写评论的价值。该模型遵循递归程序以形成总体共识。根据这种共识,将结果与专家的建议值在可接受的显着性范围内进行比较。还分析了该模型在单个实例以及在多个实现中的可重复性。一旦对原型系统进行了测试,就可以使用该仪器的第二种实现方式来进一步验证模型。通过定量测试和定性调查,研究人员可以确定工作单​​评估过程对该研究有效。发现共识等级在统计上具有显着相似性,专家小组的反馈进一步加强了这一点。尽管对调查的成本效益存在一些担忧,但专家小组同意该过程可推广到其他主题,并且对于将来的实施可重复。;基于专家小组定义的指标进行的定量测试表明,调查的总体价值存储库小于最小阈值。尽管总体价值缺乏积极的结果,研究人员提出了未来的工作并讨论了可能仍适用于手写评论领域的潜在研究领域。

著录项

  • 作者

    Thombs, Daniel.;

  • 作者单位

    Nova Southeastern University.;

  • 授予单位 Nova Southeastern University.;
  • 学科 Information Technology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 140 p.
  • 总页数 140
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号