首页> 外文学位 >The ethical priority of infinite obligation: Levinasian vulnerability as the condition for the possibility of virtue (Emmanuel Levinas).
【24h】

The ethical priority of infinite obligation: Levinasian vulnerability as the condition for the possibility of virtue (Emmanuel Levinas).

机译:无限义务的伦理优先事项:列维纳斯脆弱性是美德可能性的条件(埃曼纽尔·列维纳斯)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

My argument throughout this project is that, while virtue ethics can provide a necessary alternative to modern moral theory's application of universal laws, it is problematic to understand the ethical relation as grounded in the symmetry and reciprocity of friendship-type engagements. I therefore argue that virtue theory, and any rational conception of the "good," must be grounded in a more primordial moment of fundamentally asymmetrical obligation, which is revealed rather than rationally constituted. I draw on Levinas' account of ethical encounter as arising out of the address of the Other, which awakens in the subject a Desire for peaceful contact with the unique and precious Other. Desire leads the subject to willingly undergo a transformation in her orientation, as she devotes herself to genuine concern and loving care for the Other. My argument is driven by an exploration of the nature of heroic action, with a particular focus on accounts of rescue during the Nazi Holocaust.; I introduce the problem of asymmetry through an examination of contemporary virtue ethics. I then turn to Ricoeur's endeavor to ground ethics in virtue theory, making preliminary suggestions as to the proper role for rationality in ethics. In order to locate my discussion in reflection upon actual ethical experience, I then discuss accounts of rescue during the Holocaust, in light of Aristotle's understanding of ethics and Levinas' description of what guides and motivates self-sacrifice. In turning to Husserl, I return to the problem of rationality's role in ethics, arguing that Levinas' notion of the Other as not merely an "alter-ego" provides a necessary explanation of the urgency of the moral endeavor. Finally, through a discussion of Buber's work, I return to the problem of reciprocity, arguing that such cannot be required of ethical relations. I conclude this work by pointing in the direction of the following further developments: (1) A notion of ethical care related to feminist care ethics; (2) A proper understanding of friendship; (3) A new kind of freedom, understood as a liberation from the constraining world of the Same; and (4) A new notion of happiness to be found in sacrifice.
机译:在整个项目中,我的观点是,尽管美德伦理学可以为现代道德理论应用普遍法提供必要的选择,但要理解以友善型订婚的对称性和互惠为基础的伦理关系是有问题的。因此,我认为,美德理论以及对“善”的任何理性概念都必须建立在更为基本的不对称义务这一原始的基础上,这种义务被揭示而不是理性地构成。我借鉴列维纳斯关于他人遭遇的道德遭遇的说法,这在主题中唤起了与独特而宝贵的他者和平接触的愿望。当她致力于真正的关心和对他人的关爱时,欲望使受试者自愿地改变了自己的方向。我的论点是基于对英勇行动性质的探索,特别是纳粹大屠杀期间的救援记录。我通过考察当代美德伦理学来介绍不对称问题。然后,我转向里科(Ricoeur)在美德理论中打下道德基础的努力,就合理性在道德中的适当作用提出初步建议。为了使我的讨论能够反映出实际的道德经验,然后根据亚里士多德对道德的理解以及列维纳斯对引导和激发自我牺牲的描述,来讨论大屠杀期间的救助。在谈到胡塞尔时,我回到理性在伦理学中的作用问题,论证了列维纳斯的“他者”概念不仅仅是一个“自我”,它为道德努力的紧迫性提供了必要的解释。最后,通过对布伯的工作的讨论,我回到了互惠问题,认为这不是道德关系所必需的。最后,我通过指出以下进一步发展的方向来完成这项工作:(1)与女权主义护理伦理有关的伦理护理概念; (2)对友谊的正确理解; (3)一种新的自由,被理解为摆脱了同样世界的束缚; (4)在牺牲中发现幸福的新概念。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kirby, Katherine E.;

  • 作者单位

    Fordham University.;

  • 授予单位 Fordham University.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2006
  • 页码 353 p.
  • 总页数 353
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 哲学理论;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:39:48

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号