首页> 外文学位 >A performance comparison of suboptimal receivers used in IR-UWB communication systems operating within the IEEE 802.15.4a industrial environment.
【24h】

A performance comparison of suboptimal receivers used in IR-UWB communication systems operating within the IEEE 802.15.4a industrial environment.

机译:在IEEE 802.15.4a工业环境中运行的IR-UWB通信系统中使用的次优接收器的性能比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this thesis, the performances of the selective Rake receiver, the transmitted reference (TR) receiver and the differential detection receiver used in impulse radio ultra-wideband (IR-UWB) systems are evaluated and compared through computer simulations. The receivers are compared in terms of bit error rate (BER), system complexity, and implementation considerations. The IR-UWB systems operate in the IEEE 802.15.4a industrial line-of-sight (LOS) and non-line-of-sight (NLOS) environment channels corrupted by additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN).;The advantages and disadvantages of these three types of receivers are presented. The TR receiver and the differential detection receiver, though having lower system complexity, present a worse performance than the selective Rake receiver with multiple fingers, especially in the IEEE 802.15.4a industrial LOS environment. However, The TR receiver and the differential detection receiver are more viable than the selective Rake receiver since the complexity of the selective Rake receiver is very high in the IEEE 802.15.4a industrial NLOS environment. In the IEEE 802.15.4a industrial NLOS environment, the TR receiver has the performance level of a selective Rake receiver with 24 fingers at high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR); the differential detection receiver has a better performance than a selective Rake receiver with 48 fingers at high SNR. However, the differential detection receiver is shown to be much more sensitive to the effect of intersymbol interference (ISI) than the selective Rake receiver due to the "ISI-cross-ISI" effect produced by the correlator. In addition, in both IEEE 802.15.4a industrial LOS and NLOS environments, the BER performance of the TR receiver is about 3 dB worse than the differential detection receiver at the BER of 10-4. Based upon the obtained evaluation results, a series of suggestions are outlined for the future research and development of IR-UWB receivers.
机译:本文通过计算机仿真评估和比较了脉冲无线超宽带(IR-UWB)系统中使用的选择性瑞克接收机,传输参考接收机(TR)和差分检测接收机的性能。比较接收器的误码率(BER),系统复杂度和实现注意事项。 IR-UWB系统在IEEE 802.15.4a工业视线(LOS)和非视线(NLOS)环境通道中运行,这些通道受到加性高斯白噪声(AWGN)的破坏。介绍了这三种类型的接收器。 TR接收器和差分检测接收器虽然具有较低的系统复杂度,但与多指选择性Rake接收器相比,性能较差,尤其是在IEEE 802.15.4a工业LOS环境中。但是,TR接收器和差分检测接收器比选择性Rake接收器更具可行性,因为在IEEE 802.15.4a工业NLOS环境中,选择性Rake接收器的复杂性非常高。在IEEE 802.15.4a工业NLOS环境中,TR接收器具有24根手指的选择性Rake接收器的性能水平,且信噪比(SNR)高;差分检测接收机的性能要比具有48个分支的选择性瑞克接收机的信噪比更高。但是,由于相关器产生的“ ISI-cross-ISI”效应,与选择性瑞克接收机相比,差分检测接收机对符号间干扰(ISI)的影响更为敏感。此外,在IEEE 802.15.4a工业LOS和NLOS环境中,TR接收机的BER性能比BER为10-4的差分检测接收机差约3 dB。根据获得的评估结果,为IR-UWB接收机的未来研究和发展提出了一系列建议。

著录项

  • 作者

    Gong, Huiling.;

  • 作者单位

    Dalhousie University (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 Dalhousie University (Canada).;
  • 学科 Engineering Electronics and Electrical.
  • 学位 M.A.Sc.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 72 p.
  • 总页数 72
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 非洲史;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:39:41

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号