首页> 外文学位 >The production of style: Aesthetic and ideological diversity in the Arts and Crafts movement, 1875--1914.
【24h】

The production of style: Aesthetic and ideological diversity in the Arts and Crafts movement, 1875--1914.

机译:风格的产生:工艺美术运动中的审美和意识形态多样性,1875--1914年。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

What explains the aesthetic diversity of the Arts and Crafts movement? Typically, artistic movements are characterized by a single style but the Arts and Crafts produced both organic and geometric forms. Examining two Arts and Crafts retrospective exhibitions, I find that organic aesthetics predominated in Great Britain, Scandinavian countries, and Hungary and that geometric aesthetics were more prevalent in the United States, Germany, and Austria. This finding is largely consistent with previous sociological research on artistic form, which has found that stronger political-economies are more likely to produce geometric work while weaker political-economies are more likely to produce organic work. Austria, however, is a contradictory case and here the Arts and Crafts movement was more geometric than the political-economic model would predict.;Through a comparative-historical study, I determine that the cause of aesthetic diversity of the Arts and Crafts movement was not per se a region's political-economic situation. Rather---and in contradiction to existing sociological theories of artistic style---the aesthetic variation of the Arts and Crafts was a function of whether, in a given country, the movement was backward-looking or forward-looking which, in turn, was function of which Arts and Crafts principles particular regions privileged. In regions where the members of the movement emphasized the value of labor (Great Britain) or regionalism (Scandinavia and Hungary), the movement was backward-looking and characterized by an organic aesthetic. In contrast, in regions that emphasized the democratization of the arts (the United States and Germany) or artistic unity (Austria), the movement was forward-looking and characterized by a geometric aesthetic. I further argue that in order to make sense of the ideological diversity of the movement, we must appreciate that the Arts and Crafts was a cultural manifestation of a period of political and economic turbulence characterized by the emergence of the first great world-wide depression, the decline of British hegemony, and the rise of American hegemony. The Arts and Crafts movement served to buffer the disruptive effects of this period and, in doing so, helped to usher in the modern age.
机译:是什么解释了手工艺运动的审美多样性?通常,艺术运动的特征是单一风格,而工艺美术既产生有机形式又产生几何形式。通过审查两个手工艺品回顾展,我发现有机美学在英国,斯堪的纳维亚国家和匈牙利占主导地位,几何美学在美国,德国和奥地利更为普遍。这一发现在很大程度上与先前对艺术形式的社会学研究一致,后者发现,较强的政治经济体更有可能产生几何作品,而较弱的政治经济体更有可能产生有机作品。然而,奥地利是一个矛盾的案例,这里的手工艺品运动比政治经济学模型所预测的更具几何性。通过比较历史研究,我确定了手工艺品运动的审美多样性起因是本身不是一个地区的政治经济状况。相反,与现有的艺术风格社会学理论相矛盾的是,手工艺品的美学变化取决于在特定国家中机芯是前瞻性还是前瞻性,反过来,是特定地区的手工艺原则享有特权的功能。在该运动的成员强调劳动价值(大不列颠)或区域主义(斯堪的纳维亚和匈牙利)的地区,该运动是后瞻性的,具有有机美学的特征。相反,在强调艺术(美国和德国)或艺术统一(奥地利)民主化的地区,该机芯具有前瞻性,并具有几何美感。我进一步指出,为了理解运动的意识形态多样性,我们必须赞赏工艺美术是政治和经济动荡时期的文化表现形式,其特征是第一次世界性大萧条的出现,英国霸权的衰落和美国霸权的崛起。工艺美术运动起到了缓冲这一时期的破坏性作用的作用,并有助于迎接现代时代的到来。

著录项

  • 作者

    Rubinson, Claude James.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Arizona.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Arizona.;
  • 学科 Sociology Social Structure and Development.;Fine Arts.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 125 p.
  • 总页数 125
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:36:56

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号