首页> 外文学位 >The O. C. Voss site: Reassessing what we know about the Fort Ancient occupation of the central Scioto drainage and its tributaries.
【24h】

The O. C. Voss site: Reassessing what we know about the Fort Ancient occupation of the central Scioto drainage and its tributaries.

机译:OC Voss站点:重新评估我们对Scioto中央排水系统及其支流的Fort Fort占领的了解。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this dissertation I present newly acquired data concerning the prehistoric occupation of the O. C. Voss site in Franklin County, Ohio, and provide a contemporary analysis of the results of archaeological investigation conducted at the site more than forty years ago by the Ohio Historical Society. Results of the research suggest Fort Ancient occupation of the central Scioto River drainage and its tributaries was not confined to the early period ca. A.D. 1000-1200 nor is a depopulation of the sub-region ca. A.D. 1350 supported.;The Voss site is located on a second terrace above Big Darby Creek in the Battelle-Darby Metro Park. After excavation of the Voss Mound in 1963, the original investigators placed the Voss site within the Late Woodland Cole Complex, a newly defined taxonomic unit. Within a few years of discovery of the village site associated with the mound, other archaeologists began to question the classification of the Voss site as Late Woodland and suggested attributes of the artifact assemblage indicated a Late Prehistoric Fort Ancient affiliation. Because details of the artifact assemblage, feature type, and village organization existed mostly in the gray literature, the Voss site has retained an incipient Late Prehistoric status in the minds of many researchers in the forty-plus years since discovery of the site. The 1966 village excavations uncovered numerous pit features and two structural patterns in a configuration that suggested a circular settlement. Yet, questions remained concerning the size of the village, its internal structure, subsistence patterns, and timing of occupation.;Recent investigation of the site utilized geophysical survey in the form of magnetic survey as the paramount method of data recovery. Additional data recovery techniques included magnetic anomaly testing through removal of the plowzone, anomaly coring, limited feature excavation, and shovel testing to determine patterns of artifact density within the village site. An analysis of ceramic and lithic attributes on previously and recently excavated materials is presented and discussed in relation to established temporal indicators. Because little information has been compiled on characteristics of mound construction within the Fort Ancient community, a review and analysis of excavated and reasonably well-documented Fort Ancient mounds was undertaken to assess characteristics of the Voss Mound.;The location of the Voss site is unique as it lies at the northern margin of the Fort Ancient Culture area and is located more than 60 km north of any excavated Fort Ancient site within the Scioto River drainage. Despite its location on the northern boundary and within the dissected valleys of the Big Darby Creek, it will be argued that occupation of the site occurred during the Late Prehistoric period by Fort Ancient populations who adhered to a well-established intra-site settlement pattern of a circular village organized around a central, community-oriented plaza. The Voss site does not represent an incipient stage of the Fort Ancient Tradition of the Late Prehistoric period but rather a site utilized by Fort Ancient populations into the early 15th century.
机译:在这篇论文中,我介绍了新获得的有关俄亥俄州富兰克林县O.C. Voss遗址史前占领的数据,并提供了40年前由俄亥俄州历史学会在该遗址进行的考古调查结果的当代分析。研究结果表明,古堡对Scioto河中央排水系统及其支流的占领不限于早期。公元1000-1200年,该子区域的人口也没有减少。支持的公元1350年; Voss站点位于Battelle-Darby Metro Park的Big Darby Creek上方的第二个露台上。在1963年对Voss土墩进行挖掘之后,最初的研究人员将Voss地点置于了新定义的分类单位“ Late Woodland Cole Complex”内。在发现与丘陵相关的村庄遗址后的几年内,其他考古学家开始质疑Voss遗址的分类为“晚期林地”,并且该文物组合的属性表明了史前晚期的古堡隶属关系。由于人工制品组合,特征类型和村庄组织的详细信息大部分存在于灰色文献中,因此自发现该地点以来的40多年来,Voss地点在许多研究人员的心中一直保留着早期的史前晚期状态。 1966年的村庄发掘发现了许多坑坑特征和两种结构模式,形成了圆形沉降。然而,关于村庄的规模,村庄的内部结构,生存模式和占领时间仍然存在疑问。现场的最近调查以磁勘测的形式进行地球物理勘测是数据恢复的首要方法。其他数据恢复技术包括通过清除犁地带进行磁异常测试,取芯异常,挖掘有限的特征以及进行铁铲测试以确定村庄内人工痕迹密度的模式。结合已建立的时间指标,介绍和讨论了对以前和最近挖掘的材料的陶瓷和石器质属性的分析。由于有关Fort Ancient社区内土墩建筑特征的信息很少,因此对发掘的且合理记录的Fort Ancient土墩进行了回顾和分析,以评估Voss土墩的特征。因为它位于古堡文化区的北部边缘,并且位于Scioto河排水系统内任何古堡遗址的北部60公里以上。尽管它位于北部边界和大达比河的解剖谷内,但据称该遗址在史前晚期由古堡人占领,他们坚持建立良好的遗址内部定居模式。在一个以社区为中心的中央广场周围组织的圆形村庄。沃斯遗址不代表史前晚期古堡传统的初期阶段,而是代表古堡人口使用到15世纪早期的遗址。

著录项

  • 作者

    Brady-Rawlins, Kathleen.;

  • 作者单位

    The Ohio State University.;

  • 授予单位 The Ohio State University.;
  • 学科 Anthropology Archaeology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 320 p.
  • 总页数 320
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 古人类学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号