首页> 外文学位 >The relationship between religious rules and the moral judgments of more religious and less religious Turkish Muslims.
【24h】

The relationship between religious rules and the moral judgments of more religious and less religious Turkish Muslims.

机译:宗教规则与更多宗教信仰和较少宗教信仰的土耳其穆斯林的道德判断之间的关系。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Nucci and Turiel (1993) have demonstrated that conservative Christians and Jews judge moral issues in terms of justice, rights, and human welfare considerations, and do not solely rely on religious precepts in their moral reasoning. The purpose of this study was to examine whether Turkish Muslims' moral reasoning is also relatively independent of religious prescriptions. Using Turiel's (1983) Domain Theory, the study investigated similarities and differences in the reasoning of more religious and less religious Turks on a variety of moral issues addressed by the Qur'an (a father forcing his daughter to marry someone without her express approval, abortion, homosexuality, adultery, testifying falsely in court, polygamy). The study also investigated whether Turkish Muslims associate harmful and unjust behaviors [e.g., violating others' rights, hurting others (physically or psychologically)], which are considered grave sins in Islam (5:8) (Hashmi, 2002), with God's most severe punishment.;The study included 49 less religious Turkish students (20 males 29 females) and 49 more religious Turkish students (23 males 26 females), 18 years of age or older. Participants completed a self-report questionnaire containing six stories. Results were analyzed using a combination of Chi-Square and ANOVA techniques.;Findings largely supported the proposition of Domain Theory (Turiel, 1983) that all individuals use moral reasoning that is in part based on justice and rights concerns, even highly religious individuals. The reasoning of more religious participants was mixed between moral and religious concerns. Moral concerns dominated their reasoning when considering forcing a daughter to marry or polygamy, while religious considerations dominated their reasoning for the issue of homosexuality only. The majority of less religious participants judged the issues in terms of justice, rights, and human welfare considerations, rather than on religious precepts. Also, the majority of all participants indicated that God punishes most those who violate others' rights and who harm others. This suggests that Turkish Muslims consistently value principles of justice, rights and welfare when considering moral issues, regardless of religious orientation.
机译:Nucci和Turiel(1993)证明,保守的基督徒和犹太人从正义,权利和人类福祉的角度来评判道德问题,并且在道德推理中并不仅仅依靠宗教戒律。这项研究的目的是检验土耳其穆斯林的道德推理是否也相对独立于宗教规定。这项研究使用Turiel(1983)的领域理论,研究了土耳其人对古兰经提出的各种道德问题在宗教上和宗教上较少的土耳其人的推理中的异同点(古兰经强迫父亲的女儿未经其明确同意而嫁给某人,流产,同性恋,通奸,出庭作证,一夫多妻制)。该研究还调查了土耳其穆斯林是否将有害和不公正的行为(例如,侵犯他人的权利,在身体上或心理上伤害他人)(在伊斯兰教中被认为是严重的罪行)(5:8)(Hashmi,2002年),而这与上帝最这项研究包括18岁以下的49名宗教较少的土耳其学生(20名男性,29名女性)和49名其他宗教的土耳其学生(23名男性,26名女性)。参加者完成了一份包含六个故事的自我报告调查表。使用卡方和方差分析技术相结合来分析结果。研究结果在很大程度上支持领域理论的主张(Turiel,1983年),即所有个人都使用部分基于正义和权利关注的道德推理,甚至是高度信奉宗教的个人。在宗教和道德方面,更多宗教参与者的推理是混杂的。在考虑强迫女儿结婚或一夫多妻制时,道德上的考虑占据了他们的推理,而宗教上的考虑仅在同性恋问题上占据了他们的推理。多数宗教较少的参与者从正义,权利和人类福祉的角度来评判问题,而不是根据宗教戒律。此外,大多数参与者都表示,上帝惩罚大多数侵犯他人权利和伤害他人的人。这表明土耳其穆斯林在考虑道德问题时一贯重视正义,权利和福利原则,无论其宗教取向如何。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kuyel, Nilay Behice.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Texas at Austin.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Texas at Austin.;
  • 学科 Religion General.;Psychology Cognitive.;Education Guidance and Counseling.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 186 p.
  • 总页数 186
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:39:30

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号