首页> 外文学位 >An innovative airtightness test procedure for separating envelope air leakage from interior partition air leakage in multi-zone buildings.
【24h】

An innovative airtightness test procedure for separating envelope air leakage from interior partition air leakage in multi-zone buildings.

机译:一种创新的气密性测试程序,用于将多区域建筑物中的信封漏气与内部隔断漏气分开。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A new airtightness test procedure has been developed for separating exterior envelope air leakage from interior partition leakage, when testing a single zone within a multi-zone building. Historically, envelope leakage from a single zone within a multi-zone building could only be measured if exact equalization was achieved of the pressure differentials across all interior partition surfaces using a masking blower(s). Experimentally, this has proven to be problematic with the result that the procedure is seldom used. The new technique, called the "Parallel Flow Airtightness Test" method (PFAT) permits partition leakage to be measured and subtracted from the total leakage of the test zone thereby allowing the exterior envelope leakage to be isolated and quantified. However, instead of requiring exact equalization of the interior partition pressure differentials, the new technique only requires that they be modified from their original values. Experimentally, this is a much easier condition to achieve and offers significant advantages to practitioners.;Under laboratory conditions (with no wind or indoor-to-outdoor pressure differentials to account for), the PFAT method was capable of measuring the exterior envelope air leakage with a maximum error of about 2% at 75 Pa, when a second blower was used to modify the pressure regimes in the adjacent, buffer zone. When the pressure regimes in the buffer zone were modified by simply sealing or unsealing a duct to the buffer zone, the accuracy of the procedure degraded significantly, producing errors of up to 26%.;The field trials were then carried out on three multi-zone buildings in Winnipeg. From these trials it was concluded that the procedure seems well suited to field work and offers advantages, in terms of time and equipment, over the traditional pressure-masking technique. However, greater skill and better planning are required relative to that needed for a conventional, single-zone airtightness test. Overall, it was concluded that for many applications the PFAT method provides a workable method of separating interior partition air leakage from exterior envelope building.;As part of this thesis, the PFAT test procedure was proposed, validated in a series of laboratory trials and then applied to three different buildings to assess its practicality under real-world conditions. Using the results of the laboratory and field work, guidelines were then developed for applying the methodology to other structures.
机译:当测试多区域建筑物内的单个区域时,已经开发了一种新的气密性测试程序,用于将外部信封空气泄漏与内部隔墙泄漏分开。从历史上看,只有在使用遮盖鼓风机实现所有内部分隔表面的压差达到精确平衡的情况下,才能测量多区域建筑物中单个区域的信封泄漏。实验证明,这是有问题的,其结果是很少使用该程序。这项新技术被称为“平行流气密性测试”(PFAT)方法,它可以测量隔板泄漏并从测试区域的总泄漏中减去,从而可以隔离和量化外部外壳泄漏。然而,代替要求内部分隔压力差的精确均衡,新技术仅要求从其原始值进行修改。在实验上,这是一个更容易实现的条件,并且为从业人员提供了显着的优势。在实验室条件下(无风或室内到室外的压差不考虑在内),PFAT方法能够测量外壳的空气泄漏当使用第二台鼓风机修改相邻缓冲区的压力范围时,最大误差在75 Pa时约为2%。当通过简单地将管道密封或开封到缓冲区来改变缓冲区的压力状态时,该过程的准确性会大大降低,产生的误差高达26%。温尼伯的区域建筑。从这些试验得出的结论是,该程序似乎很适合现场工作,并且在时间和设备方面都比传统的压力掩蔽技术更具优势。但是,与常规的单区域气密性测试相比,需要更高的技能和更好的计划。总的来说,得出的结论是,对于许多应用,PFAT方法提供了一种将内部隔断空气泄漏与外部围护结构分离的可行方法。作为本论文的一部分,提出了PFAT测试程序,并在一系列实验室试验中进行了验证,然后应用于三座不同的建筑物,以评估其在实际条件下的实用性。利用实验室和现场工作的结果,制定了将方法学应用于其他结构的指南。

著录项

  • 作者

    Proskiw, Gary.;

  • 作者单位

    Concordia University (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 Concordia University (Canada).;
  • 学科 Engineering Civil.
  • 学位 M.A.Sc.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 181 p.
  • 总页数 181
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:39:30

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号