首页> 外文学位 >Modes, monads and nomads: Individuals in Spinoza, Leibniz and Deleuze.
【24h】

Modes, monads and nomads: Individuals in Spinoza, Leibniz and Deleuze.

机译:模式,单子和游牧民族:斯宾诺莎,莱布尼兹和德勒兹的人。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The dissertation is a comparative study of the theory of individuals (in the most general ontological sense) in Spinoza, Leibniz and Deleuze, aiming to reach a better understanding of all three of these theories. The parallels drawn between them serve to illuminate all three, but this study is especially oriented towards the understanding of Deleuze, whose theory, being about three hundred years younger, has received the least philosophical attention.;My comparison is structured by parallel subdivisions into essence, existence and actual individuals. That is, for each of the three philosophers to be studied, I consider what they propose as the essence of an individual, how they conceive its existence to come about, and what activity characterizes the actual individual once it exists. Based on readings of key primary texts, I show that all three philosophers share a conception of essence as the principle of activity of the individual of which it is the essence. Their accounts of how existence comes about, however, are widely divergent, and as a result the way the essence acts as a principle of activity for the actual individual is distinctive in each philosopher's account.;As a secondary task, I undertake to criticize a few points in Deleuze's reading of Spinoza and Leibniz. I contend, through a careful consideration of Deleuze's claims and a comparison with the relevant texts in Spinoza and Leibniz, that Deleuze's introduction of the concepts of intensity and extensity into his reading of Spinoza, and his account of the relationship between individual and world in Leibniz, do more to obscure Spinoza and Leibniz's claims than to clarify them.;As might be expected, the overall picture that emerges is a complicated one. Deleuze is not as close to Spinoza or Leibniz as his own comments on them might at times suggest. Spinoza and Leibniz differ on many specific points. And yet all three philosophers share a broad conception of the role of the essence of an individual.
机译:本文是对斯宾诺莎,莱布尼兹和德勒兹的个人理论(在最普遍的本体论意义上)的比较研究,旨在更好地理解这三种理论。它们之间的相似之处有助于阐明所有这三个方面,但是本研究特别针对对德勒兹的理解,德勒兹的理论大约年轻了三百年,受到的哲学关注最少。 ,存在和实际个体。也就是说,对于要研究的三位哲学家中的每一个,我认为他们提出的作为个人本质的东西,他们如何设想其存在的存在,以及一旦实际存在的人具有什么特征的活动。基于对主要主要文章的阅读,我发现所有三位哲学家都将本质概念作为个人活动的原理,而本质是本质。然而,他们对生存方式的描述却大相径庭,因此,在每个哲学家的论述中,本质作为实际个体的活动原理的方式各不相同。作为第二项任务,我承诺批评一个德勒兹阅读斯宾诺莎和莱布尼兹的几点要点。我认为,通过仔细考虑德勒兹的主张,并与斯宾诺莎和莱布尼兹的相关文本进行比较,我认为德勒兹在对斯宾诺莎的阅读中引入了强度和可扩展性概念,以及他在莱布尼兹关于个人与世界之间关系的论述。 ,要使斯宾诺莎和莱布尼兹的主张模糊不清,而不是澄清它们。;可以预期,出现的总体情况是一个复杂的过程。德勒兹与斯宾诺莎或莱布尼兹的关系并不像他自己对它们的评论有时暗示的那样。斯宾诺莎和莱布尼兹在许多特定方面有所不同。然而,这三位哲学家都对个人本质的作用有着广泛的理解。

著录项

  • 作者

    Wilkins, Adam.;

  • 作者单位

    State University of New York at Stony Brook.;

  • 授予单位 State University of New York at Stony Brook.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 260 p.
  • 总页数 260
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:39:31

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号