首页> 外文学位 >Empirical examination of the determinants of corruption: Cross-sectional and panel analysis.
【24h】

Empirical examination of the determinants of corruption: Cross-sectional and panel analysis.

机译:腐败决定因素的实证检验:横截面和面板分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study explores the determinants of corruption, using cross-sectional, panel random-effects, and dynamic panel analysis to check the robustness of the results to alternative specifications and estimation methods. The study uses two different indexes of perceived corruption, the Corruption Perception Index (CPI) and the Control of Corruption measure (CC), to check the robustness of the results with alternative corruption measures. The study also uses a large array of explanatory variables that may influence corruption, including a large set of economic variables, a set of political variables, and a group of sociocultural variables.;The first interesting result indicates that the rule of law strongly impacts corruption and that a better quality of law enforcement is correlated with lower corruption. Moreover, rich countries are perceived to have lower corruption than poor countries. This work highlights the importance of the rule of law and per capita GDP in the battle against corruption. Furthermore, this study finds the following. Lagged corruption impacts current level of corruption. Larger countries seem to have higher perceived corruption. A larger percentage of the population that is rural is associated with higher perceived corruption. Higher proportion of seats held by women in the national parliament is associated with lower corruption. Political stability, regulatory quality, ethnic fractionalization, and natural resource abundance do not impact corruption in my analysis. This study also examined the impact of some other factors on corruption such as voice and accountability, government effectiveness, the cost of business start-up procedures, the ratio of average government wage to per capita GDP, the degree of openness to international trade, membership in various religions, the level of economic development, and the legal system origin.
机译:这项研究使用横截面,面板随机效应和动态面板分析来探索腐败的决定因素,以检查结果是否符合替代规范和估计方法。该研究使用两种不同的感知腐败指标,即腐败感知指数(CPI)和腐败控制措施(CC),以检验采用其他腐败措施的结果的稳健性。该研究还使用了大量可能影响腐败的解释变量,包括大量的经济变量,一系列的政治变量和一组社会文化变量。第一个有趣的结果表明,法治对腐败的影响很大。执法质量的提高与腐败的减少相关。此外,人们认为富裕国家的腐败程度要低于穷国。这项工作突出了法治和人均GDP在反腐败斗争中的重要性。此外,本研究发现以下内容。滞后的腐败会影响当前的腐败程度。较大的国家似乎对腐败的认识更高。农村人口的较大比例与较高的腐败感相关。妇女在国民议会中所占席位的增加与腐败的减少有关。在我的分析中,政治稳定,监管质量,种族分割和自然资源丰富不会影响腐败。这项研究还考察了其他一些因素对腐败的影响,例如发言权和问责制,政府效力,业务启动程序的成本,政府平均工资与人均GDP的比率,对国际贸易的开放程度,成员资格在各种宗教中,经济发展的水平以及法律制度的起源。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    Colorado State University.;

  • 授予单位 Colorado State University.;
  • 学科 Economics General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 137 p.
  • 总页数 137
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号