首页> 外文学位 >Family structure and income redistribution policies: Comparing child poverty outcomes in Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States .
【24h】

Family structure and income redistribution policies: Comparing child poverty outcomes in Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States .

机译:家庭结构和收入再分配政策:比较加拿大,英国和美国的儿童贫困状况。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The United States has greater income inequality and higher child poverty than any other industrialized, wealthy nation, which greatly impacts opportunities for American children. Given that social and economic institutions are predicated on the breadwinner-homemaker family structure as the ideal family, family formation and living arrangements also appear to create disadvantages and high poverty risk for some children. Government income redistribution policies have varied success in reducing child poverty, especially among children living in vulnerable family structures. Cross-national comparisons may provide useful information for improving the effectiveness of antipoverty policies.; This study used data from Wave V of the Luxembourg Income Study to comparatively analyze income redistribution and relative child poverty in various family structures in nationally representative samples from Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Single mother, single father, two-parent, single grandmother, single grandfather, and two-parent grandparent families with children under the age of 18 were analyzed. Structural functional theory is used as a guiding conceptual framework. Results indicate that income from government programs is differentially redistributed across various family structures in all three countries, often with smaller child poverty reductions among more vulnerable family structures. Single mother families have the highest child poverty rates at each phase of income redistribution, while two-parent families have the lowest rates. Children living in grandparent-headed families experience the largest reductions in poverty through income redistribution. Children living in households with young children have higher poverty rates at each phase of income redistribution than children living in households with no young children, yet they experience smaller reductions in poverty across all three countries. The United States has the highest child poverty rates in all examined structures at each phase of income redistribution, while the United Kingdom reduces child poverty by the largest proportion. While income is redistributed differentially by family structure, the utilization of structural characteristics for policy development is questioned. Policy implications for improving child poverty reduction efforts in the United States through labor market regulation, caregiving relief, and caregiving support are discussed.
机译:与任何其他工业化富裕国家相比,美国拥有更大的收入不平等和更高的儿童贫困度,这极大地影响了美国儿童的机会。鉴于社会和经济机构以养家糊口的家庭结构作为理想家庭为基础,家庭的形成和生活安排似乎也给某些儿童带来了不利条件和高贫困风险。政府的收入再分配政策在减少儿童贫困方面取得了不同的成功,特别是在生活在脆弱家庭结构中的儿童中。跨国比较可以为提高反贫困政策的有效性提供有用的信息。这项研究使用了来自卢森堡收入研究(Luxembourg Income Study)第五轮的数据,以加拿大,英国和美国为代表的全国样本,比较分析了各种家庭结构中的收入再分配和相对儿童贫困状况。分析了有18岁以下子女的单亲母亲,单亲父亲,双亲,单亲祖母,单祖父和双亲祖父母家庭。结构功能理论被用作指导概念框架。结果表明,来自政府计划的收入在所有三个国家的各个家庭结构中均以不同的方式重新分配,通常在较脆弱的家庭结构中儿童贫困减少的幅度较小。在收入分配的每个阶段,单身母亲家庭的儿童贫困率最高,而双亲家庭的贫困率最低。生活在祖父母为首的家庭中的儿童通过收入再分配而最大程度地减少了贫困。与没有孩子的家庭相比,有孩子的家庭的儿童在收入再分配的各个阶段的贫困率更高,但在这三个国家中,他们的贫困减少率均较小。在收入重新分配的每个阶段中,美国在所有受审查的结构中儿童贫困率最高,而英国最大程度地减少了儿童贫困。虽然收入是按家庭结构差异分配的,但人们质疑利用结构特征进行政策制定。讨论了通过劳动力市场法规,照料救济和照料支持改善美国减少儿童贫困工作的政策含义。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    University of Maryland, College Park.$bFamily Studies.;

  • 授予单位 University of Maryland, College Park.$bFamily Studies.;
  • 学科 Sociology Public and Social Welfare.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 129 p.
  • 总页数 129
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 社会福利、社会救济、社会保障;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号