首页> 外文学位 >The question of ground and the truth of being: Heidegger's WS 1931/2 lecture course 'Vom Wesen der Wahrheit: zu Platons Hoeblengleichnis und Theaetet'.
【24h】

The question of ground and the truth of being: Heidegger's WS 1931/2 lecture course 'Vom Wesen der Wahrheit: zu Platons Hoeblengleichnis und Theaetet'.

机译:地面问题和存在的真实性问题:海德格尔的WS 1931/2讲座课程“从真理的本质:到柏拉图的寓言和戏剧寓言”。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Recent availability of texts in Martin Heidegger's Gesamtausgabe have called into question the longstanding paradigm that has guided the interpretation of Heidegger's writings and the understanding of his philosophical project as a whole. This paradigm is based on a conception of the Kehre, the turning, as a developmental shift from the primacy of the human being to the primacy of being in Heidegger's thinking that took place in the 1930s and that marks the distinction between the "early" and the "later" Heidegger. The publication of Contributions to Philosophy: From Enowning, composed in 1936--38, challenges this conception by characterizing the turning not as a developmental shift but rather as the reciprocal movement of being's need for the human being and the human being's belonging to being, which constitutes Ereignis, enowning, as the dynamic relation that makes possible the givenness of beings. This dissertation is an attempt to elucidate the meaning of the turning in enowning that must hold a central place in the development of a new paradigm for Heidegger interpretation.; The dissertation begins with Heidegger's directive that the question of truth is a way of access to the question of the ground of the givenness of beings and his further identification of Plato's allegory of the cave as the moment in the history of philosophy that may serve as a proper introduction to the question of truth in its primordiality. It then engages the question of aletheia, truth, developed in the interpretation of Plato's allegory of the cave that Heidegger presented in his 1931-32 winter semester lectures at Freiburg. In the dissertation I show how Heidegger's interpretation of aletheia in Plato exemplifies "turning thinking" as the thinking of "turning relations" wherein the relation itself grounds and makes possible what is related in it. Such thinking, I maintain, is prefigured in Being and Time (1927) and fulfilled in Contributions to Philosophy (1936--38) as the thinking of the turning in enowning. The dissertation proceeds by carrying out the explicit application of the later account of the turning in Contributions to the lecture course on truth in order to reflexively illuminate both Heidegger's interpretation of Plato's allegory and the meaning of the turning.
机译:马丁·海德格尔(Martin Heidegger)的《格桑陶斯加贝(Gesamtausgabe)》中最近出现的文本使人们质疑长期存在的范式,该范式指导了对海德格尔的著作的解释以及对他的整个哲学计划的理解。这种范式基于凯勒(Kehre)概念的转变,即从人类的首要地位向1930年代海德格尔思想中的首要地位的发展转变,标志着“早期”与“早期”之间的区别。 “后来的”海德格尔。 1936--38年间出版的《对哲学的贡献:来自于占有》一书对这一概念提出了挑战,其特征在于转向不是人类发展需要,而是人类对人类和人类归属感的往复运动,它构成了埃里尼尼斯(Ereignis),将其作为一种动态关系,使存在的存在成为可能。本论文试图阐明所有权转变的意义,这种转变必须在海德格尔解释的新范式发展中占据中心位置。论文首先从海德格尔的指示开始,即真理问题是一种通往存在存在性问题的途径,他进一步将柏拉图的洞穴寓言视为哲学史上的关键时刻。正确地介绍了原始的真理问题。然后,它涉及了对无意识状态,真理的问题,这是在解释柏拉图对海德寓言的寓言中发展出来的,海德格尔在弗莱堡的1931-32冬季学期演讲中提出了这种寓言。在论文中,我展示了海德格尔对柏拉图的无意识状态的解释是如何将“转向思想”作为“转向关系”的思想的例子,其中关系本身是基础的,并使其中的联系成为可能。我坚持认为,这种思想被《存在与时间》(Being and Time,1927)所掩盖,并在《对哲学的贡献(1936--38)》中得以实现,作为对所有权转向的思考。论文是通过对后来的转折行为的明确说明而进行的,从而对海德格尔对柏拉图寓言的诠释和转折的意义进行了阐释。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hersey, John M.;

  • 作者单位

    The Catholic University of America.;

  • 授予单位 The Catholic University of America.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 313 p.
  • 总页数 313
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 哲学理论;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:39:12

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号