首页> 外文学位 >Assessing the effect of group model building on stakeholder teams developing urban growth strategies.
【24h】

Assessing the effect of group model building on stakeholder teams developing urban growth strategies.

机译:评估小组模型构建对利益相关者团队制定城市增长战略的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Government in growing cities has a difficult time responding to problems that come with growth. The combination of the complexity of the problem, fragmentation in jurisdictions and responsibilities, and regional consequences produce diverse views of exactly what the problem is, what causes it, and how it is best addressed. The organizational structure of municipal government is not conducive to collaboration. Accordingly, governments have turned increasingly to stakeholder groups to develop growth management strategies. However, these stakeholder groups are not particularly successful. They struggle to achieve consensus even when facilitated and their recommendations often go unimplemented. The question I investigate in this research is: what can be done to help stakeholder groups working on urban growth problems be more successful?; I evaluate the hypothesis: facilitating a stakeholder team working on urban growth problem using a system dynamics group model building approach will result in a greater degree success than is achieved by a traditional facilitation approach by comparing the degrees of collaboration and consensus achieved by two real-world stakeholder groups with similar tasks, contexts, and constructs. Both groups were 'professionally' facilitated, one using a system dynamics group model building approach and the other a traditional non-modeling approach.; The results show the model building group achieved significantly higher degrees of collaboration and consensus than the traditionally facilitated group. I investigated the processes and found the traditionally facilitated group did not discuss causes, and mixed problem discussion of the problem and solutions. The model building group discussed problem definition, causes sequentially, and balanced amount of attention given to each. The group also used a simulation model to test alternative solutions for their effect. These results suggest the difference in success can be attributed to superiority of the group model building process to integrate the diverse views that derive from complex problems and contexts.; The results support the hypothesis, and suggest that stakeholder teams dealing with complex and messy problems and problem-solving environments can increase the degree of collaboration and consensus achieved where the facilitation approach is selected in consideration of the task and context characteristics.
机译:成长中的城市政府在应对增长带来的问题时遇到困难。问题的复杂性,管辖权和责任的分散以及地区后果的结合,产生了对问题到底是什么,原因是什么以及如何最好地解决的各种观点。市政府的组织结构不利于合作。因此,政府越来越多地转向利益相关者团体来制定增长管理策略。但是,这些利益相关者团体并不是特别成功。他们即使在获得便利的情况下也难以达成共识,而他们的建议也常常得不到执行。我在这项研究中调查的问题是:可以采取什么措施来帮助致力于城市增长问题的利益相关者团体取得更大的成功?我评估了这一假设:通过比较两个实际合作伙伴的协作程度和共识程度,使用系统动力学组模型构建方法促进利益相关者团队的工作与传统促进方法相比,将获得更大程度的成功。具有相似任务,环境和构造的世界利益相关者团体。两组都在“专业”上得到了帮助,一组使用系统动力学组模型构建方法,另一组使用传统的非建模方法。结果表明,模型构建小组比传统的促进小组获得了更高程度的协作和共识。我调查了过程,发现传统上受助的小组没有讨论原因,而是对问题和解决方案进行了混合讨论。模型构建小组讨论了问题的定义,顺序原因以及对每个问题的关注度。该小组还使用模拟模型来测试替代解决方案的效果。这些结果表明,成功的差异可以归因于组模型构建过程的优越性,以整合源自复杂问题和环境的各种观点。结果支持该假设,并建议处理复杂,混乱问题和解决问题环境的利益相关者团队可以提高在考虑任务和上下文特征的情况下选择促进方法的协作和共识程度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号