首页> 外文学位 >Investigating the intersections between the archaeological and geological components of the Grand Canyon landscape from a geoarchaeological perspective on ceramics and sources.
【24h】

Investigating the intersections between the archaeological and geological components of the Grand Canyon landscape from a geoarchaeological perspective on ceramics and sources.

机译:从陶瓷和资源的考古学角度研究大峡谷景观的考古和地质组成部分之间的交叉点。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation investigates fundamental problems surrounding the provenance and technology of Ancestral Puebloan ceramics from the eastern Grand Canyon region of northern Arizona. The analytical frameworks of the research are grounded in geology and materials science, and the dissertation explores novel isotopic techniques for characterization of archaeological ceramics and geological sources of ceramic raw materials.;The majority of the dissertation focuses on two ceramic traditions in the Upper Basin of the Coconino Plateau during the period A.D. 800-1200: (1) Tusayan Gray Ware (TGW), associated with the "Kayenta Anasazi"; and (2) San Francisco Mountain Gray Ware (SFMGW), associated with the "Cohonina." Given that: (1) gray-ware ceramics are conventionally assumed to have been made with local materials wherever they are found in abundance; (2) both TGW and SFMGW occur in abundance in the Upper Basin; and (3) a single geological formation is the parent for all ceramic materials within "local" resource catchments (as defined by archaeological models); then TGW and SFMGW recovered from the Upper Basin should have similar mineralogical and geochemical compositions that match those of local materials.;Collectively, petrographic, Sr isotopic, and Pb isotopic analyses establish that TGW and SFMGW ceramics are constituted of materials that are significantly different in composition and geological origin. Moreover, the likely source materials for SFMGW are non-local with respect to the archaeological project area, suggesting that gray-ware ceramics were transported significant distances to the Upper Basin. In short, it appears that conventional archaeological assumptions about gray-ware ceramics and their sources do not hold up under analytical scrutiny; by extension, corollary assumptions about the significance of gray wares as markers of archaeological groups are also drawn into question.;The dissertation also presents an investigation of the compositional and morphological attributes of black paints on Ancestral Puebloan white-ware ceramics. This research demonstrates that the compositional contrasts between the black paints and white slips do not involve the elements traditionally identified as colorants in black-on-white Ancestral Puebloan ceramics, presenting an archaeometric enigma that highlights the need for additional analytical work on a problem that has long been considered well-characterized.
机译:本文研究了亚利桑那州北部大峡谷东部地区祖先普韦布洛陶瓷起源和技术的基本问题。研究的分析框架建立在地质和材料科学的基础上,本论文探索了用于表征考古陶瓷和陶瓷原材料地质来源的新型同位素技术。论文主要研究了上流域的两种陶瓷传统。公元800-1200年期间的科科尼诺高原:(1)与“ Kayenta Anasazi”相关的图萨扬灰制品(TGW); (2)与“ Cohonina”有关的旧金山山灰制品(SFMGW)。鉴于以下原因:(1)通常认为灰瓷陶瓷是用当地材料制成的,无论它们存在于何处。 (2)TGW和SFMGW都大量出现在上流域; (3)单一的地质构造是“局部”资源流域(由考古模型定义)内所有陶瓷材料的母体;则从岩相,Sr同位素和Pb同位素分析共同确定,TGW和SFMGW陶瓷是由明显不同的材料构成的。组成和地质起源。此外,SFMGW的可能原材料相对于考古项目区域而言是非本地的,这表明灰色陶器陶瓷已被运送到相当远的上游盆地。简而言之,似乎对灰瓷陶瓷及其来源的传统考古假设在分析研究中并未成立。通过扩展,人们也得出了关于灰色器皿作为考古学标记的重要性的推论性假设。;论文还研究了先祖普韦布洛(Puebloan)白色器皿陶瓷上黑色涂料的成分和形态属性。这项研究表明,黑色涂料和白色涂料之间的成分对比不涉及传统上被认为是黑白祖先普韦布洛陶瓷中的着色剂的元素,呈现出一种考古学上的谜题,突显了对存在以下问题的其他分析工作的需要长期以来被认为具有很好的特征。

著录项

  • 作者

    Carter, Sidney W.;

  • 作者单位

    Stanford University.;

  • 授予单位 Stanford University.;
  • 学科 Anthropology Archaeology.;Geology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 242 p.
  • 总页数 242
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号