首页> 外文学位 >文献详情
【24h】

Capitalist Transformation and the Evolution of Civil Society in a South Indian Fishery.

机译:南印度渔业中的资本主义转型与公民社会的演变。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This thesis employs Karl Polanyi's concept of the double-movement of capitalism to trace the trajectory of a social movement that arose in response to capitalist transformation in the fishery of Kanyakumari district, south India. Beginning in the 1980s, this counter-movement militantly asserted community control over marine resources, arguing that intensified production for new markets should be subordinated to the social imperatives of subsistence and equity. Two decades later, the ambition of "embedding" the market within the community had yielded instead to an adaptation to the market in the language of "professionalization," self-help, and caste uplift.;Polanyi is useful for identifying the constituency for a counter-movement against the market, but tells us little about the social or political complexities of constructing such a movement. To locate the reasons for the decline of the counter-movement in Kanyakumari, I turn therefore to an empirical observation of the civil society within which the counter-movement arose. In doing this, I argue against Partha Chatterjee's influential view that civil society as a conceptual category does not apply to "popular politics in most of the world," and is not useful for tracing non-European, post-colonial, and subaltern modernities. By contrast, my case shows the presence of civil society -- as a sphere of autonomous and routinized association and publicity -- among subaltern groups in rural India. I argue that it is precisely by locating the counter-movement of fishworkers within civil society that one can map the multiple negotiations that take place as subaltern classes are integrated into the market, and into liberal democracy, and explain the difficulties of extending and sustaining the counter-movement itself.
机译:本文采用卡尔·波兰尼(Karl Polanyi)的资本主义双重运动的概念,来追溯社会运动的轨迹,该运动是由于印度南部坎亚库马里区渔业中的资本主义变革而产生的。从1980年代开始,这一反动势力主张社区对海洋资源的控制,认为新市场集约化生产应服从于生存和公平的社会要求。二十年后,“嵌入”社区内部市场的野心反而转而以“专业化”,“自助”和“种姓提升”的语言适应市场。; Polanyi可用于识别社区的选民。对抗市场的反动,但对于构​​造这种运动的社会或政治复杂性知之甚少。为了找到Kanyakumari反动派减少的原因,因此,我转向对反动派在其中发生的公民社会进行的经验观察。在此过程中,我反对查塔吉(Partha Chatterjee)的有影响力的观点,即民间社会作为概念类别不适用于“世界上大多数地方的大众政治”,并且对于追踪非欧洲的,后殖民的和次要的现代性也没有用。相比之下,我的案例表明,在印度农村的下属组织中,民间社会的存在是一个自治的,常规化的协会和宣传领域。我认为,恰恰是通过定位民间社会中渔业工人的反动,可以描绘出随着次要阶级被纳入市场和自由民主制度而进行的多重谈判,并解释了扩大和维持渔业的困难。反运动本身。

著录项

  • 作者

    Sundar, Aparna.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Toronto (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Toronto (Canada).;
  • 学科 Political Science General.;Agriculture Fisheries and Aquaculture.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 359 p.
  • 总页数 359
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:36:54

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
站内服务
  • 写作辅导
  • 期刊发表
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号