首页> 外文学位 >Undoing circumscription: The effect of critical career counseling ingredients on the expansion of women's career choices.
【24h】

Undoing circumscription: The effect of critical career counseling ingredients on the expansion of women's career choices.

机译:取消限制:重要的职业咨询成分对女性职业选择扩展的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Though career counseling outpaces psychotherapy in effecting gains (Hackett, 1993), positively influences career-related self-awareness and knowledge (Whiston, Sexton, & Lasoff, 1998), and yields high overall client satisfaction rates (Mau & Fernandes, 2001), a more sophisticated understanding of its mechanisms for success and differential effectiveness is needed. The purpose of this dissertation was to build upon Brown and Ryan Krane's (2000) research about critical ingredients that contribute to career counseling's strong outcomes by testing the power of an intervention that combined three components---individualized attention, a writing exercise, and a support-building activity---versus an intervention that included one ingredient---individualized attention---to influence session satisfaction, career indecision, vocational identity, and consideration of occupations, with an expectation that effectiveness would differ depending upon participants' presenting problems (e.g., need for career choice expansion or confirmation). Women were the planned focus of the investigation because of their overrepresentation within career counseling clientele (Goodman & Savage, 1999) and their need for an expanded occupational scope in light of their tendency to prematurely narrow options, oftentimes eliminating higher paying and/or status positions (Betz, 1994, 2005; Gottfredson, 1981, 2002, 2005). However, because of comparable responses and increased statistical power, men and women were included in the sample.;The participants (N = 168) were university students who took the Strong Interest Inventory (SII) through a vocational planning course or the campus career center. They attended an SII interpretation session and were randomly assigned to complete: (a) an experimental writing intervention followed by a series of posttest measures, or (b) a control set of surveys that included the posttest measures. Although the results did not reveal significant differences between the treatment conditions in terms of session satisfaction, career decidedness, vocational identity, or number/breadth of occupations considered, they did provide partial support for the differential effectiveness of the treatment-plus condition by problem type. After completing the writing intervention, individuals who sought career choice confirmation considered fewer Conventional occupations, experienced lower indecision, and had higher vocational identity levels than those who required career choice expansion. Based on these findings, implications for theory and practice, limitations, and future research directions are discussed.
机译:尽管职业咨询在获得收益方面超过了心理治疗(Hackett,1993年),但对与职业相关的自我意识和知识产生了积极影响(Whiston,Sexton和Lasoff,1998年),并产生了较高的总体客户满意率(Mau&Fernandes,2001年),需要对其成功和差异有效性的机制有更深入的了解。本论文的目的是基于Brown和Ryan Krane(2000)对关键要素的研究,该要素通过测试将三个要素结合在一起的干预的力量来促进职业咨询的强劲成果-个性化注意力,写作练习和支持建立活动-相对于一项干预措施而言,干预措施包括一种成分-个人关注度-影响会议满意度,职业优柔寡断,职业认同和对职业的考虑,并期望其有效性会因参与者的演讲而异问题(例如,需要扩大职业选择或确认)。妇女是调查的计划重点,因为她们在职业咨询客户中的任职人数过多(Goodman&Savage,1999年),并且鉴于她们倾向于过早地缩小选择范围,往往需要取消较高的薪资和/或地位,因此她们需要扩大职业范围(Betz,1994,2005; Gottfredson,1981,2002,2005)。但是,由于可比的回答和增强的统计能力,样本中包括了男性和女性。参与者(N = 168)是通过职业规划课程或校园职业中心参加的强烈兴趣量表(SII)的大学生。 。他们参加了SII解释会议,并被随机分配以完成:(a)实验写作干预,然后进行一系列后期测试,或(b)包括该后期测试的一系列对照调查。尽管结果并未显示出治疗条件之间在会话满意度,职业决定,职业认同或所考虑职业的数量/宽度方面的显着差异,但它们确实为按问题类型区分治疗加条件的不同有效性提供了部分支持。 。完成写作干预后,寻求职业选择确认的人员与那些需要扩展职业选择的人员相比,认为传统职业较少,优柔寡断并且职业身份水平较高。基于这些发现,讨论了对理论和实践的意义,局限性以及未来的研究方向。

著录项

  • 作者

    Porter, Sarah H.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Santa Barbara.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Santa Barbara.;
  • 学科 Womens Studies.;Psychology Clinical.;Education Guidance and Counseling.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 221 p.
  • 总页数 221
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 社会学;教育;医学心理学、病理心理学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号