首页> 外文学位 >Always already almost here: Levinas, Derrida, and an ethico-political theatre.
【24h】

Always already almost here: Levinas, Derrida, and an ethico-political theatre.

机译:几乎总是在这里:列维纳斯(Levinas),德里达(德里达)和一个民族政治剧院。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This work begins and ends with the problem of the theatre's political efficacy and the bringing about of a just spectatorial response. Various scholars have utilized the tools of "post-" theories, and especially the work of Jacques Derrida, as a means to assess the political value of contemporary performance. Extraordinarily few, however, make reference to a notion of ethics. My project takes into account the ethical philosophy of Emmanuel Levinas as, arguably, the most important intertext for Derridean deconstruction, thus introducing an explicit notion of ethics—a radical transcendence that is wholly incommensurable with the political realm—into this existing body of work. In doing so, it is possible to question this work, to assess its victories and reveal its blind spots toward a revisioning of the possibility of a just, or what I term an "ethico-political," theatre.;It is not, however, just the context that must be specifically established, but also the text. Toward this end, DNA Theatre's production of Paula and Karl will be subjected to detailed analysis—this time through the lens of Derrida's reading of "hospitality" in the work of Levinas—in order to interrogate the strategic mechanisms by which an ethico-political theatre might operate.;This work concludes by radically destabilizing the very notion of an ethico-political theatre. In a sense, every theatre is an ethico-political theatre, while in another sense this theatre cannot be properly actualized. It is precisely this lack of stability that keeps strategy from slipping into dogma, and is the ephemeral source of this theatre's potentially just impact upon those who witness it.;But can deconstruction operate as intended in the context of the theatre? Derrida envisioned and practised deconstruction in the context of philosophy, which possesses an aura of seriousness (Reality) unlike the context of performance, which is saturated with playfulness (Illusion). As such, it is essential to explore the strategic contextual deployment of reality and illusion within the theatre, such that this formative contextual element is foregrounded. Of particular interest here are forms that subvert conventional contexts, such as various movements within the twentieth century avant-garde performance tradition, which are discussed through this lens.
机译:这项工作的开始和结束都涉及剧院的政治效力和公正的视觉回应问题。许多学者利用“后”理论的工具,尤其是雅克·德里达的著作,来评估当代表演的政治价值。但是,很少有人提到道德概念。我的项目考虑到伊曼纽尔·列维纳斯的道德哲学,可以说是德里达解构主义的最重要中介,因此将一种明确的伦理学概念(一种根本上与政治领域无法比拟的根本性超越)引入了现有的工作体系。通过这样做,可以质疑这项工作,评估其胜利并揭示其对修订公正性或我称之为“民族政治”剧院的可能性的盲点。 ,只是必须明确建立的上下文,还有文本。为此,将对DNA剧院的Paula和Karl的作品进行详细的分析-这次是通过Derrida对Levinas作品中“热情好客”的解读,以审视民族政治戏剧的战略机制。可能会奏效。这项工作的结尾是从根本上破坏了民族政治剧院的概念。从某种意义上说,每个剧院都是一个民族政治剧院,而从另一个意义上说,这个剧院不能正确实现。正是由于缺乏稳定性,使策略无法陷入教条中,并且该剧院的短暂来源可能会对目击者产生短暂影响。;但是,解构能否在剧院范围内按预期进行?德里达在哲学的语境中设想并实践了解构,它具有严肃的光环(现实),而表演的语境则充满了嬉戏(幻觉)。因此,至关重要的是要在剧院内探索现实和幻觉的战略背景部署,以使这种形成背景的元素成为前景。这里特别令人感兴趣的是颠覆传统背景的形式,例如通过该镜头讨论的二十世纪前卫表演传统中的各种运动。

著录项

  • 作者

    Stedman, Samuel Thomas.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Toronto (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Toronto (Canada).;
  • 学科 Theater.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 256 p.
  • 总页数 256
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:39:03

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号