首页> 外文学位 >The open courts principle and the Internet: Transparency of the judicial process promoted by the use of technology and a solution for a reasoned access to court records.
【24h】

The open courts principle and the Internet: Transparency of the judicial process promoted by the use of technology and a solution for a reasoned access to court records.

机译:公开法院的原则和互联网:通过使用技术和合理访问法院记录的解决方案,司法程序的透明度得以提高。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The justice system has worked, to date, under conditions of practical obscurity, but now that technology affords us easier and better access to court information, why would we consider that limiting access will make the justice system better? New technologies are only tools available for the citizenry to access information.; The Canadian Judicial Council 2005 Protocol and Policy, recognize the importance of the open courts principle, but propose unprecedented limitations to the inclusion of information that was until now available in judgments, court records and dockets.; I will demonstrate that the open courts principle is not to be pushed aside without proper testing based on solid criteria which is to be conducted on a case by case basis, on an approach which is not statutory or policy driven, and which is flexible and leaves the judge in control of the judicial process.
机译:迄今为止,司法系统在实际情况模糊的条件下仍然有效,但是现在,技术使我们能够更轻松,更好地访问法院信息,为什么我们认为限制访问会改善司法系统呢?新技术只是公民获取信息的工具。加拿大司法委员会《 2005年议定书和政策》认识到公开法院原则的重要性,但提出了前所未有的限制,以包括迄今为止在判决书,法院记录和诉讼中可用的信息。我将证明,不公开审判的原则应在不基于稳固标准的情况下进行适当的测试,而该标准将根据具体情况进行适当的测试,该标准将基于个案,以非法定或政策驱动的方式进行,且应具有灵活性并留有余地。法官控制司法程序。

著录项

  • 作者

    Racicot, Marc-Aurele.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Alberta (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Alberta (Canada).;
  • 学科 Law.; Information Science.
  • 学位 LL.M.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 143 p.
  • 总页数 143
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 法律;信息与知识传播;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:39:05

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号