首页> 外文会议>System Dynamics Society International Conference; 20060723-27; Nijmegen(NL) >Mental Models and Dynamic Decision Making: An Experimental Approach for Testing System Methodologies
【24h】

Mental Models and Dynamic Decision Making: An Experimental Approach for Testing System Methodologies

机译:心理模型和动态决策:测试系统方法的实验方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The effect systems thinking and system dynamics on a person's dynamic decision-making abilities is yet not fully known. To explore this relationship, a controlled experimental study was conducted. Results of the study show that most participants initially had poor understanding of basic dynamic situations. However, the completeness and accuracy of their mental models improved considerably with system interventions. Specifically participants' ability to discern between stocks and flows, identify causal relationships and feedback improved by around 27% after systems thinking intervention. These abilities further increased by around 4% after participants underwent a system dynamics intervention. Interestingly, in complex tasks, systems thinking hardly made any positive effect on participants' decision-making. However, for the same tasks, participants' mental models improved significantly after system dynamics intervention. This study contributes to the long-standing debate on the links between system methodologies and dynamic decision-making: particularly the relative contribution of systems thinking and system dynamics to decision-making.
机译:关于一个人的动态决策能力的效果系统思维和系统动力学尚不完全清楚。为了探索这种关系,进行了对照实验研究。研究结果表明,大多数参与者最初对基本的动态情况了解甚少。但是,通过系统干预,他们的心理模型的完整性和准确性大大提高了。具体来说,在系统考虑干预之后,参与者识别库存和流量,确定因果关系和反馈的能力提高了约27%。在参与者进行了系统动力学干预后,这些能力进一步提高了约4%。有趣的是,在复杂的任务中,系统思考几乎不会对参与者的决策产生任何积极影响。但是,对于相同的任务,在系统动力学干预之后,参与者的心理模型得到了显着改善。这项研究有助于就系统方法论与动态决策之间的联系进行长期辩论,尤其是系统思维和系统动力学对决策的相对贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号