首页> 外文会议>Society of Tribologists and Lubrication Engineers annual meeting and exhibition 2010 >The Value of Tribology (Part 1), Analyses from a Macroeconomic Viewpoint
【24h】

The Value of Tribology (Part 1), Analyses from a Macroeconomic Viewpoint

机译:摩擦学的价值(第1部分),从宏观经济学的角度进行分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Tribology has contributed to the control of friction and wear of machine elements, which cause mal-function and failure of machinery and equipment (hereinafter referred to collectively as machinery). Tribology therefore is one of the most important and basic sciences and technologies for machine elements and operation of machinery. However it is very difficult to quantify the value of tribology. Sir Jost and his team made analysis of lubrication losses in UK in 1966. Their achievement is known together with the terminology of "tribology". ASME published "Strategy for energy conservation through tribology" in 1977 and 1981 and discussed the role of tribology for energy conservation. The National Research Council Canada published "A Strategy for Tribology in Canada" in 1986 and discussed the role of tribology for enhancing reliability and efficiency through the reduction of friction and wear. However the authors believe that it is difficult to make the management of companies understand the value of tribology. Lately achievements of the management are evaluated on "Return on Assets (ROA)" and "Return on Equity (ROE)". Why shouldn't we use the same method to evaluate the value of tribology for convincing managements?rnIn order to evaluate the value of tribology from the macroeconomic viewpoint, the authors analyzed the statistical data published by Japanese Government and the financial reports of leading Japanese companies, which are published for investors. This paper discusses that maintenance of machinery is the job of optimizing ROA and intends to demonstrate that the value of tribology is largerthan hitherto thought.
机译:摩擦学有助于控制机械零件的摩擦和磨损,这些摩擦和磨损会导致机械功能失常和机械设备(以下统称机械)故障。因此,摩擦学是机器要素和机器操作的最重要,最基础的科学和技术之一。但是,很难量化摩擦学的价值。约斯特爵士和他的团队在1966年对英国的润滑损失进行了分析。他们的成就与“摩擦学”术语一起众所周知。 ASME在1977年和1981年发表了“通过摩擦学进行节能的策略”,并讨论了摩擦学在节能中的作用。加拿大国家研究委员会(National Research Council Canada)于1986年发表了《加拿大摩擦学策略》,并讨论了摩擦学在通过减少摩擦和磨损来提高可靠性和效率方面的作用。但是作者认为,很难使公司管理层了解摩擦学的价值。最近的管理成就通过“资产回报率(ROA)”和“权益回报率(ROE)”进行评估。为什么我们不应该使用相同的方法来评估摩擦学的价值以说服管理层?为了从宏观经济的角度评估摩擦学的价值,作者分析了日本政府发布的统计数据以及日本领先企业的财务报告,这是为投资者发布的。本文讨论了机械维护是优化ROA的工作,并旨在证明摩擦学的价值要比迄今为止所想的要大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号