首页> 外文会议>Simulation Conference >Synthesizing engineering design, material takeoff and simulation-based estimating on a bridge deck reinforcement case
【24h】

Synthesizing engineering design, material takeoff and simulation-based estimating on a bridge deck reinforcement case

机译:综合工程设计,材料起飞和基于模拟的桥面加固案例评估

获取原文

摘要

To enhance the accuracy in estimating material and crew costs for steel reinforcement installation, numerous estimating tools have been developed. “Precise estimating” in general considers both lapping details and other required supporting structures while deriving the crew cost by accounting for reinforcing operations. In contrast, “rough estimating” ignores rebar lapping details in quantity takeoff and relies on industry benchmark productivity data for crew cost estimation. The distinction between “precise estimating” and “rough estimating” still lacks quantitative evidence and remains vague to both academic researchers and professional estimators. This research presents systematic comparison between the two estimating strategies with a case study of a bridge deck. A discrete event simulation tool is used to aid in estimating the crew cost in reinforcement handling and installation. The estimating results indicate that compared with the “precise estimating” approach, the “rough estimating” approach underestimates the material and crew costs by 13% and 38%, respectively.
机译:为了提高估算钢筋安装的材料和人员成本的准确性,已经开发了许多估算工具。通常,“精确估算”会同时考虑研磨细节和其他所需的支撑结构,同时通过考虑加强运营来得出机组成本。相比之下,“粗略估算”则忽略了螺纹钢搭接在数量起飞中的细节,而是依靠行业基准生产率数据来估算机组成本。 “精确估计”和“粗略估计”之间的区别仍然缺乏定量证据,并且对学术研究人员和专业估计人员而言仍然含糊不清。这项研究以桥梁桥面为例,对两种估算策略进行了系统的比较。离散事件模拟工具用于协助估算加固处理和安装中的机组人员成本。估计结果表明,与“精确估计”方法相比,“粗略估计”方法分别将材料和人员成本低估了13%和38%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号