首页> 外文会议>Shape Casting >A COMPARISON OF METHODS USED TO ASSESS ALUMINIUM MELT QUALITY
【24h】

A COMPARISON OF METHODS USED TO ASSESS ALUMINIUM MELT QUALITY

机译:铝熔体质量评估方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study reviews and compares the techniques such as LIMCA, PoDFA, Prefil, LIAS and RPT that are used to quantify defects in liquid aluminium alloys. In general, it is found that most of the current techniques are not fully satisfactory. Only the Reduced Pressure Test (RPT) appears to give reliable results of the number and size of bifilms (and sometimes, but not infallibly, an indication of hydrogen content). The density (or Density Index) is valuable, but requires the supplement of additional quantification from the number and size of bifilms, which are recommended as additional major quality indicators. The use of a new Melt Quality chart is described.
机译:这项研究回顾并比较了LIMCA,PoDFA,Prefil,LIAS和RPT等技术,这些技术用于量化液态铝合金中的缺陷。通常,发现大多数当前技术不能完全令人满意。只有减压试验(RPT)才能给出双膜的数量和大小的可靠结果(有时但并非毫无疑问地表明氢含量)。密度(或密度指数)很有价值,但需要从双胶卷的数量和大小中补充定量,建议将其作为附加的主要质量指标。描述了新的熔体质量图表的使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号