首页> 外文会议>Semantics, analytics, visualization >Geographical Trends in Research: A Preliminary Analysis on Authors' Affiliations
【24h】

Geographical Trends in Research: A Preliminary Analysis on Authors' Affiliations

机译:研究的地理趋势:作者所属关系的初步分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In the last decade, research literature reached an enormous volume with an unprecedented current annual increase of 1.5 million new publications. As research gets ever more global and new countries and institutions, either from academia or corporate environment, start to contribute with their share, it is important to monitor this complex scenario and understand its dynamics. We present a study on a conference proceedings dataset extracted from Springer Nature Scigraph that illustrates insightful geographical trends and highlights the unbalanced growth of competitive research institutions worldwide. Results emerged from our micro and macro analysis show that the distributions among countries of institutions and papers follow a power law, and thus very few countries keep producing most of the papers accepted by high-tier conferences. In addition, we found that the annual and overall turnover rate of the top 5, 10 and 25 countries is extremely low, suggesting a very static landscape in which new entries struggle to emerge. Finally, we highlight the presence of an increasing gap between the number of institutions initiating and overseeing research endeavours (i.e. first and last authors' affiliations) and the total number of institutions participating in research. As a consequence of our analysis, the paper also discusses our experience in working with affiliations: an utterly simple matter at first glance, that is instead revealed to be a complex research and technical challenge yet far from being solved.
机译:在过去的十年中,研究文献数量惊人,目前每年新增150万本新出版物。随着研究越来越多地来自学术界或公司环境中的全球性和新兴国家和机构,它们开始贡献自己的力量,重要的是监视这种复杂的情况并了解其动态。我们对从Springer Nature Scigraph中提取的会议录数据集进行了一项研究,该数据集说明了深刻的地理趋势,并强调了全球竞争性研究机构的不平衡增长。从我们的微观和宏观分析得出的结果表明,机构和论文在国家间的分布遵循幂律,因此很少有国家继续制作高层会议接受的大多数论文。此外,我们发现排名前5,前10和后25个国家/地区的年营业额和整体营业额极低,这表明新的参赛者很难在一个静态的格局中出现。最后,我们着重指出,发起和监督研究工作的机构数量(即第一作者和最后作者的隶属关系)与参与研究的机构总数之间存在着越来越大的差距。作为我们分析的结果,本文还讨论了我们在处理从属关系方面的经验:乍一看是一件非常简单的事情,相反,它被揭示为一项复杂的研究和技术挑战,但尚未解决。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号