首页> 外文会议>Reliability and optimization of structural systems >Identification of the parameters of complex constitutive models: Least squares minimization vs. Bayesian updating
【24h】

Identification of the parameters of complex constitutive models: Least squares minimization vs. Bayesian updating

机译:识别复杂本构模型的参数:最小二乘最小化与贝叶斯更新

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this study the common least-squares minimization approach is compared to the Bayesian updating procedure. In the content of material parameter identification the posterior parameter density function is obtained from its prior and the likelihood function of the measurements. By using Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods, such as the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm (Hastings 1970), the global density function including local peaks can be computed. Thus this procedure enables an accurate evaluation of the global parameter quality. However, the computational effort is remarkable larger compared to the minimization approach. Thus several methodologies for an efficient approximation of the likelihood function are discussed in the present study.
机译:在这项研究中,将常见的最小二乘最小化方法与贝叶斯更新过程进行了比较。在材料参数标识的内容中,后验参数密度函数是从其先验和测量的似然函数获得的。通过使用马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗方法,例如Metropolis-Hastings算法(Hastings,1970年),可以计算出包括局部峰在内的整体密度函数。因此,该过程使得能够精确评估全局参数质量。但是,与最小化方法相比,计算量大得多。因此,在本研究中讨论了几种有效逼近似然函数的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号