【24h】

CURRENT RESEARCH AND FUTURE EXPECTATIONS OF RSE BURNING

机译:RSE燃烧的研究现状和未来展望

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The scientific method is the process in which the fire investigator, among other steps, develops arnhypothesis and tests it. The 2011 NFPA 921, §20.5.1, states that “Fire testing is a tool that can provide data thatrncompliment data collected at the fire scene (see 4.3.3), or can be used to test hypotheses (see 4.3.6). Such firerntesting can range in scope from bench scale testing to full-scale recreation of the entire event.” (bold and italicsrnadded). A Full Scale Enclosure (FSE) testing of a hypothesis may be quite expensive, time consuming, and just notrnpractical. Building and burning a Reduced Scale Enclosure (RSE) may provide insight into the various fire effects,rnpatterns, and dynamics within the enclosure.rnAfter burning over fifty FSE, RSE, and furniture combinations, fourteen RSE and one FSE were burned andrnevaluated. To help ensure valid tests, propane sand burners were used in both the FSE and RSE. The FSE had anrnignition source of an approximate 100 kW (341,214 BTU/Hr) while the RSE had an ignition source of anrnapproximate 3 kW (10,236 BTU/Hr). It was shown that when the parameters are held relatively consistent, then thernRSE results were repeatable and were in general agreement with the FSE. Since burning of the RSE occurredrnoutside year round, ambient temperatures and wind affected the results but were not calculated or considered. Thisrnclearly demonstrated that even with these variables, general agreement between the FSE and RSE occurred.rnThe results of the test consistently showed fire growth with rapid fire spread across the couch when the upper layerrnincreased in energy and then progressed across the room and ignited the stuffed chair. Consistently roll over wasrnobserved in the interior chair camera. A consistent and predicted phenomenon occurred just over the stuffed chair inrnthat it registered one of the highest room temperatures. This is explained by an abundant source of fuel, oxygen, andrnheat.rnThe construction of the scaled furniture appears to represent the fire effects and fire patterns of the FSE reasonablyrnwell. Though three fires developed very slowly, for unknown reasons, once energy feedback by the upper layerrnkicked in, they responded like all of the others. The concept of developing heavy, medium and light furniturerndesigns appears to help improve the visual representation as well as provided the required fuel packages. Furtherrnwork is being conducted to refine and verify the design so that a reliable and reproducible guideline may berndeveloped.rnA RSE is not only a tool for hypothesis testing but is a great tool for investigator to fine tune their skills as well asrndevelop new ones. These RSEs are inexpensive; easy to construct; easy on time; and just another way of for the firerninvestigator to gain more hands one experience.
机译:科学方法是火灾调查员除其他步骤外开发无假说并对其进行测试的过程。 2011年NFPA 921,第20.5.1节指出:“火灾测试是一种工具,可以提供在火灾现场收集的符合性数据的数据(请参阅4.3.3),也可以用于检验假设(请参见4.3.6)。此类防火测试的范围从台式测试到整个活动的全面娱乐。” (加粗和斜体字)。假设的全面封闭(FSE)测试可能非常昂贵,耗时且不切实际。建造和燃烧缩小规模的机柜(RSE)可以深入了解机柜内的各种火灾效果,模式和动态。燃烧超过50种FSE,RSE和家具组合后,将对14台RSE和一台FSE进行燃烧和重新评估。为了帮助确保有效的测试,FSE和RSE中均使用了丙烷砂燃烧器。 FSE的点火源约为100 kW(341,214 BTU / Hr),而RSE的点火源约为3 kW(10,236 BTU / Hr)。结果表明,当参数保持相对一致时,RSE结果是可重复的,并且与FSE总体上是一致的。由于RSE的燃烧是在全年之外发生的,因此环境温度和风影响了结果,但并未进行计算或考虑。这清楚地表明,即使有这些变量,FSE和RSE仍会达成一般协议。测试结果一致显示,当上层能量增加,然后在整个房间内前进并点燃填充椅子时,火焰迅速蔓延到整个沙发上,迅速蔓延开来。 。始终翻转在室内椅子摄像头中观察到的wasrnobserved。在填充椅子上出现了一致且可预测的现象,这表明它记录到了最高的室温之一。这可以通过丰富的燃料,氧气和热量来解释。比例家具的构造似乎可以合理地代表FSE的着火效果和着火方式。尽管由于未知原因三场大火非常缓慢地发展,但一旦上层的能量反馈进入,它们就会像其他所有火一样响应。开发重型,中型和轻型家具设计的概念似乎有助于改善外观,并提供所需的燃料包。正在进行进一步的工作来完善和验证设计,以便可以制定出可靠且可重复的准则。RSE不仅是假设检验的工具,而且还是研究人员微调其技能以及开发新技能的重要工具。这些RSE价格便宜。易于构建;准时;这是解雇调查员获得更多经验的另一种方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号