首页> 外文会议>Physics of Medical Imaging pt.1; Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging; vol.8 no.29; Proceedings of SPIE-The International Society for Optical Engineering; vol.6510 pt.1 >Evaluation of Scatter Mitigation Strategies for X-Ray Cone-Beam CT: impact of Scatter Subtraction and Anti-Scatter Grids on Contrast-to-Noise Ratio
【24h】

Evaluation of Scatter Mitigation Strategies for X-Ray Cone-Beam CT: impact of Scatter Subtraction and Anti-Scatter Grids on Contrast-to-Noise Ratio

机译:X射线锥形束CT的散射缓解策略评估:散射相减和反散射网格对对比度噪声比的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The large contribution of scatter to cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) x-ray projections significantly degrades image quality, both through streaking and cupping artifacts and by loss of low contrast boundary detectability. The goal of this investigation is to compare the efficacy of three widely used scatter mitigation methods: subtractive scatter correction (SSC); anti-scatter grids (ASG); and beam modulating with bowtie filters; for improving signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and cupping artifacts. A simple analytic model was developed to predict scatter-to-primary ratio (SPR) and CNR as a function of cylindrical phantom thickness. In addition, CBCT x-ray projections of a CatPhan QA phantom were measured, using a Varian CBCT imaging system, and computed, using an inhouse Monte Carlo photon-transport code to more realistically evaluate the impact of scatter mitigation techniques. Images formed with uncorrected sinograrns acquired without ASGs and bow-tie filter show pronounced cupping artifacts and loss of contrast. Subtraction of measured scatter profiles restores image uniformity and CT number accuracy, but does not improve CNR, since the improvement in contrast almost exactly offset by the increase in relative x-ray noise. ASGs were found to modestly improve CNR (up to 20%, depending ASG primary transmission and selectivity) only in body scans, while they can reduce CNR for head phantoms where SPR is low.
机译:散射对锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)X射线投影的巨大贡献,通过条纹和杯形伪像以及低对比度边界可检测性的损失,大大降低了图像质量。这项研究的目的是比较三种广泛使用的散布缓解方法的功效:减法散布校正(SSC);消散散布校正(SSC);消散散布校正(SSC)。防散射网格(ASG);和用领结滤波器调制光束;用于改善信噪比(SNR),对比度,对比度与噪声比(CNR)和拔罐伪影。建立了一个简单的分析模型,以预测散射与原始比率(SPR)和CNR与圆柱体模型厚度的函数关系。此外,使用Varian CBCT成像系统测量了CatPhan QA体模的CBCT X射线投影,并使用内部的蒙特卡洛光子传输代码进行了计算,以更实际地评估散射缓解技术的影响。在没有ASG和领结滤镜的情况下,使用未经校正的正弦纹形成的图像显示出明显的拔罐伪像和对比度损失。减去测得的散射轮廓可恢复图像均匀性和CT数精度,但不会改善CNR,因为对比度的提高几乎被相对X射线噪声的增加完全抵消了。发现仅在身体扫描中,ASG才能适度地改善CNR(取决于ASG的主要透射率和选择性,最多可提高20%),而它们可以降低SPR低的头部模型的CNR。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号