首页> 外文会议>International Conference on eDemocracy and eGovernment >Democracy Framework, ColaboFlow, and Wikipedia - Governing Face-to-virtual Systems and Processes According to Democratic and Ethical Principles
【24h】

Democracy Framework, ColaboFlow, and Wikipedia - Governing Face-to-virtual Systems and Processes According to Democratic and Ethical Principles

机译:民主框架、ColaboFlow和维基百科——根据民主和道德原则,政府面对虚拟系统和过程

获取原文

摘要

We are witnessing a dramatic migration of society from the real world into virtual worlds (online systems) and face-to-virtual worlds (hybrid systems and events). Apart from the conventional e-gov and e-dem systems, virtual worlds (social media or other forms of online systems) become increasingly used as tools for promoting (or suppressing) democratic values and calls for changes. There is significant research on designing more efficient systems for practising e-democracy and (digital) ethics [1] [2]. However, fewer examples exist when it comes to mechanisms capable of managing democratic and ethical values in neutral digital systems whose main purpose is not related to e-gov and e-dem [3]. Together with a large stratum of society, power structures also migrate to virtual worlds. Therefore, there is a strong need to successfully migrate and enable democratic and ethical principles - one of the oldest and the most important values of a society.We propose a paradigm shift in system design to make online systems more transparent and open to external evaluation by neutral domain experts and institutions through visual workflows and behavioral processes. One implementation of such an approach is the ColaboFlow workflow framework, together with an associated domain-specific framework - Democracy Framework. We argue for the benefits of such an approach especially in the face-to-virtual context, which has become the primary modus operandi for many community-related events during the COVID- 19 era. We demonstrate ColaboFlow and Democracy in the real context of Wikipedia by analyzing its community and users, i.e. knowledge workers, and their behavior. We analyze and evaluate the Wikipedia community’s engagement (motivation) and participation in collaborative work in the relationship in terms of democratic and ethical community behaviors. We observe the types and quantities of the Wikipedia policies that knowledge workers refer to in the process of deliberative democracy, and correlate these findings with user behavior and motivation for contributing within the online ecosystem. We propose a two-tier model where we detect system anomalies at the (i) high, statistical and resource-cheap level, and understand and semi-automatically normalize (heal) the recognized anomalies at the (ii) low, behavioral and resource-demanding level.
机译:我们正在目睹社会从现实世界向虚拟世界(在线系统)和虚拟世界(混合系统和事件)的戏剧性迁移。除了传统的电子政务和电子数字高程模型系统外,虚拟世界(社交媒体或其他形式的在线系统)越来越多地被用作促进(或压制)民主价值观和呼吁变革的工具。关于设计更高效的电子民主和(数字)道德实践系统的重要研究[1][2]。然而,在中性数字系统中,能够管理民主和道德价值观的机制,其主要目的与电子政务和电子数字高程模型无关的例子较少[3]。权力结构与社会大阶层一起,也向虚拟世界转移。因此,迫切需要成功地迁移并实现民主和道德原则——这是一个社会最古老、最重要的价值观之一。我们提出了系统设计的范式转变,通过可视化工作流和行为过程,使在线系统更加透明,并对中立领域专家和机构的外部评估更加开放。这种方法的一个实现是ColaboFlow工作流框架,以及相关的领域特定框架——Democracy框架。我们主张这种方法的好处,尤其是在面对虚拟环境时,虚拟环境已成为新冠肺炎时代许多社区相关活动的主要操作方式。我们通过分析维基百科的社区和用户(即知识工作者)及其行为,在真实的维基百科环境中展示了ColaboFlow和民主。我们从民主和道德社区行为的角度分析和评估维基百科社区的参与(动机)和参与合作工作的关系。我们观察了知识工作者在协商民主过程中提到的维基百科政策的类型和数量,并将这些发现与用户行为和在线生态系统中的贡献动机相关联。我们提出了一个两层模型,在该模型中,我们在(i)高、统计和资源廉价水平上检测系统异常,并在(ii)低、行为和资源需求水平上理解和半自动地标准化(治愈)已识别的异常。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号