首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Law Reform >Indonesian Democracy: Folk Party or Humanitarian Tragedy?
【24h】

Indonesian Democracy: Folk Party or Humanitarian Tragedy?

机译:印尼民主:民间政党还是人道主义悲剧?

获取原文

摘要

Democracy and the holding of general elections (Elections) are two sides of a coin that are closely intertwined. In 2019, a new history begins in the General Election, along with the Constitutional Court ruling Number 14/PUU-XI/2013 in the trial case of Law Number 42 Year 2008 concerning General Elections which states that the Election of Members of DPR RI, DPD and DPRD (Legislative Election), and Election of President and Vice President (Pilpres) must be simultaneous, not separate as practiced so far. However, after the simultaneous elections, many people died from the Voters Organizing Group (KPPS), the Election Supervisory Committee (Panwaslu), and members of the National Police. Based on preliminary data compiled by the Ministry of Health, the number of election organizers who died totaled 527 people and the number of sick people numbered 11,239 people. This is an ironic fact, the election which should be a place to determine political rights for the people, actually caused many casualties. The problem in this research is, How is the simultaneous election law construction in 2019 in Indonesia related to the norms contained in the 1945 NRI Constitution? The method used in this research is normative juridical with descriptive analysis approach. The expected results in this study are the simultaneous elections in 2019 need to be re-evaluated its implementation. On this basis, it is of course very much expected that the government together with the DPR will immediately draw up the regulation of the Special Law on simultaneous elections, with the aim that the legal certainty aspect is realized as it should. This can be done by judicial review or towards a higher direction, namely the 5th Amendment to the NRI Constitution of 1945.
机译:民主和举行大选(选举)是一枚硬币的两面,紧密交织在一起。2019年,大选开始了一段新的历史,宪法法院在2008年第42号关于大选的法律审判案中做出了第14/PUU-XI/2013号裁决,该裁决规定,民主进步党、民主进步党和民主进步党成员的选举(立法选举)以及总统和副总统的选举必须是同时进行的,而不是迄今为止的做法。然而,在同时举行的选举之后,许多人死于选民组织团体(KPPS)、选举监督委员会(Panwaslu)和国家警察。根据卫生部汇编的初步数据,选举组织者死亡人数为527人,患病人数为11239人。这是一个具有讽刺意味的事实,选举本应是决定人民政治权利的地方,但却造成了许多伤亡。本研究中的问题是,2019年印度尼西亚同时选举法的构建与1945年NRI宪法中的规范有何关联?本研究所采用的方法是规范法学和描述性分析方法。本研究的预期结果是,2019年同时举行的选举需要重新评估其执行情况。在此基础上,人们当然非常期待政府与朝鲜民主主义人民共和国一起,立即制定关于同时选举的特别法条例,以期实现法律确定性方面的应有目标。这可以通过司法审查或更高的方向来实现,即1945年《NRI宪法》第五修正案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号