首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Law Reform >Cooperative Principles (Partnership-Based Togetherness) as the Legal Basis of Democracy Economic Thinking
【24h】

Cooperative Principles (Partnership-Based Togetherness) as the Legal Basis of Democracy Economic Thinking

机译:合作原则(基于伙伴关系的统一)是民主经济思维的法律依据

获取原文

摘要

One The imperative of economic democracy mandated by the constitution through Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution, the reality is not a legal foundations appreciation to economic activities, but even shifts to a free-market economy (laissez-faire). This is confirmed in the constitution "permanent position" of Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution the which relies on the notion of "mutualim and brotherhood" and Article II of the Transitional Rules of the 1945 Constitution roomates are temporary. The retention of the individual principle is a legal reason and at the same time a legal source that is Easily dictated by economic forces, from outside based on individual principles. The aim of this paper is 1) to analyze how the understanding of cooperative principles (cooperation based on mutualism) is manifested as the legal basis on the thought of economic democracy, 2) To analyze how the implementation of Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution into Indonesian economic law tends to lead to free competition. The approach used is normative and descriptive analysis Juridical type. The Conclusions of economic democracy are contained in the Explanation of Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution; and cooperative principles based on mutualism are not legal fundamentals for economic democracy. The Conclusions of economic democracy are contained in the Explanation of Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution; and cooperative principles based on mutualism are not legal fundamentals for economic democracy. The Conclusions of economic democracy are contained in the Explanation of Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution; and cooperative principles based on mutualism are not legal fundamentals for economic democracy.
机译:宪法通过1945年宪法第33条宪法授权的经济民主的必要性,现实不是对经济活动的法律基础,甚至转向自由市场经济(Laissez-Faire)。这在1945年“宪法”第33条第33条“永久立场”中依赖于“兄弟情谊”第33条的“永久立场”,而1945年章程股息的过渡规则第三条是暂时的。个人原则的保留是一个法律原因,同时是根据个人原则的经济力量轻松决定的法律来源。本文的目的是1)分析如何理解合作原则(基于共同主义的合作),表现为对经济民主思想的法律依据,2)分析1945年宪法第33条的实施方式。印度尼西亚经济法往往会导致自由竞争。使用的方法是规范性和描述性分析法则类型。经济民主的结论载于1945年宪法第33条的解释;基于共同主义的合作原则不是经济民主的法律基础。经济民主的结论载于1945年宪法第33条的解释;基于共同主义的合作原则不是经济民主的法律基础。经济民主的结论载于1945年宪法第33条的解释;基于共同主义的合作原则不是经济民主的法律基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号