首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Nuclear Criticality Safety >ESTABLISHING NO CREDIBLE RISK OF INADVERTENT CRITICALITY FOR THE K-25 DEMOLITION PROJECT
【24h】

ESTABLISHING NO CREDIBLE RISK OF INADVERTENT CRITICALITY FOR THE K-25 DEMOLITION PROJECT

机译:为K-25拆迁项目建立无意中无关紧要的可信风险

获取原文

摘要

Demolition of the K-25 Gaseous Diffusion Plant required establishing a non-credible risk of inadvertent criticality because a Criticality Accident Alarm System (CAAS) could not be reliably maintained operable as the building was being torn down. Preparation for, and demolition of, the facility was a multi-year long effort with significant changes in approach. The most significant change was to demolish the facility with as much of the process gas equipment and piping left in the facility as possible, rather than removing all process gas equipment and piping from the facility prior to demolishing the building structure only. The contractor had to adapt their approach to accommodate these changes. The normal approach to demolition was to remove all process gas equipment and piping prior to demolition, using Nuclear Criticality Safety (NCS) controls based on the double contingency principle, while CAAS coverage was intact. Then, the building structure was demolished with no requirement for a CAAS. This was the method used to demolish the K-33 Building, for example. In the case of K-25 demolition, all equipment and piping that met the Environmental Management Waste Management Facility (EMWMF) disposal cell Waste Acceptance Criteria (WAC) was left in the building and removed as part of the building demolition process. This resulted in significant quantities of fissionable material remaining in the building and being handled during demolition. The NCS Organization worked closely with several groups during preparation activities. A Data Management organization was established to specifically identify every piece of process gas equipment and piping in the facility so that it could be accounted for and characterized. Deactivation & Decommissioning (D&D) personnel conducted internal visual inspections, by remote camera, of all process gas equipment and piping larger than 3" diameter, to reveal any large deposits that would require removal. Non-Destructive Assay (NDA) of the vast majority of equipment and piping was required to quantify the amount of fissionable material remaining. Finally, all process gas equipment and piping larger than 3" diameter was internally filled with foam, which was credited by NCS with immobilizing the remaining fissionable material such that large migration and accumulation could not occur during demolition activities. NCS personnel worked closely with all of these groups in order to acquire the data and information needed to establish a non-credible risk of inadvertent criticality during building demolition. Good communication and a close working relationship between NCS, the various D&D/characterization personnel, and the Department of Energy (DOE) ensured the success of the modified approach to building demolition. The same successful approach is currently underway in the K-27 Building as well.
机译:拆除K-25气态扩散厂,要求建立不可易于临界风险的不可信任风险,因为由于建筑物被拆除,因此无法可靠地保持可靠地保持可操作的临界临界风险。筹备和拆迁,该设施是一种多年的努力,具有重大变化的方法。最重要的变化是将该设施拆除,尽可能多地拆除工艺气体设备和管道,而不是在仅拆除建筑结构之前从设施中取出所有工艺气体设备和管道。承包商必须适应他们的方法来适应这些变化。拆迁的正常方法是在拆除所有过程气体设备和管道之前,使用基于双重应乏原则的核临界安全(NCS)控制,而CAAS覆盖率完整。然后,拆除建筑结构,没有任何要求CAA。例如,这是用于拆除K-33建筑的方法。在K-25拆迁的情况下,符合环境管理废物管理设施(EMWMF)处理细胞废物验收标准(WAC)的所有设备和管道被留在建筑物中,并作为建筑拆迁过程的一部分被移除。这导致了大量的可裂变材料,剩余在建筑物中并在拆迁期间处理。 NCS组织在准备活动期间与几个群体密切合作。建立了数据管理组织,以专门识别设施中的每一块加工气体设备和管道,以便可以占据并表征。停用和退役(D&D)人员通过远程摄像机,所有加工气体设备和大于3英寸的管道进行内部视觉检查,以揭示任何需要去除的大沉积物。绝大多数的非破坏性测定(NDA)需要设备和管道来量化剩余的可裂变材料的量。最后,所有工艺气体设备和大于3英寸的管道均填充泡沫,其通过NCS归功于固定剩余的可裂化材料,使得大型裂化材料在拆迁活动期间无法发生积累。 NCS人员与所有这些群体密切合作,以获取在建立拆迁期间在建立拆迁期间建立非可信临界风险所需的数据和信息。良好的沟通和NCS,各种D&D /表征人员之间的密切工作关系,以及能源部(DOE)确保了修改的建筑拆迁方法的成功。 K-27建筑物目前正在进行同样的成功方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号