Text format written questions evaluation Methodology

机译：文本格式书面问题评估方法

获取原文

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

This paper presents a method to analyze students natural language text format written answers, to test questions and check its agreement with teacher s provided alternative answers. It shows the use of graphics and techniques which will allow to assign values to concepts and relations, to evaluate the student provided answer to compare it with the pondering of the base answer provided by a teacher.

机译：本文介绍了一种分析学生自然语言文本格式书面答案的方法，以测试问题并检查其与教师何种替代答案的协议。它显示了使用图形和技术的使用，这将允许将值分配给概念和关系，以评估学生提供的答案，以便将其与教师提供的基本答案的思考进行比较。

著录项

来源
《Iberian Conference on Information Systems andechnologies》|2016年|1 v.|共4页
会议地点
作者
Maria Alejandra Paz Menvielle; Mario A. Groppo; Marcelo M. Marciszack; Martín Casatti;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
会议组织
原文格式 PDF
正文语种
中图分类 TP391.41;
关键词
Silicon; Natural languages; Graphics; Text analysis; Text recognition; Surges;

机译：硅;自然语言;图形;文本分析;文本识别;浪涌;
入库时间 2022-08-20 23:05:43

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Using text analysis software to detect deception in written short-answer questions in employee selection [J] . Forsyth Loch, Anglim Jeromy International journal of selection and assessment . 2020,第3期

机译：使用文本分析软件在员工选择中检测书面简短问题的欺骗
2. Consumers Better Understand and Prefer Simplified Written Drug Information: An Evaluation of 2 Novel Formats Versus the Current CMI [J] . Aker Julie, Beck Melissa, Papay Julie I., Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science. . 2013,第1期

机译：消费者更好地理解和偏爱简化的书面药品信息：相对于当前CMI的2种新颖格式的评估
3. Efficiency Analysis of Two Written Short-Answer Student Evaluation Formats [J] . Stratford Paul W. Physical therapy . 1988,第10期

机译：两种书面的短答案学生评价格式的效率分析
4. Text format written questions evaluation Methodology [C] . Maria Alejandra Paz Menvielle, Mario A. Groppo, Marcelo M. Marciszack, Information Systems and Technologies . 2016

机译：文字格式书面问题评估方法
5. The effects of focused instruction of evaluation, inferential, and literal questions on written responses to narrative text by second grade students [D] . Tyrrell, Joyce M. 1990

机译：重点评估，推论和文字问题的指导对二年级学生对叙述性文字的书面回应的影响
6. Workshops for developing written exam questions go online: appropriate format according to the participants [O] . Wilma Anschuetz, Felicitas Wagner, Patrick Jucker-Kupper, 2021

机译：开发书面考试问题的研讨会上网：根据参与者的适当格式
7. ACC/AHA guidelines for the evaluation and management of chronic heart failure in the adult: executive summary A report of the american college of cardiology/american heart association task force on practice guidelines (committee to revise the 1995 guidelines for the evaluation and management of heart failure) developed in collaboration with the international society for heart and lung transplantation endorsed by the heart failure society of america51The document was approved by the American College of Cardiology Board of Trustees in November 2001 and the American Heart Association Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee in September 2001.52When citing this document, the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association would appreciate the following citation format: Hunt SA, Baker DW, Chin MH, Cinquegrani MP, Feldman AM, Francis GS, Ganiats TG, Goldstein S, Gregoratos G, Jessup ML, Noble RJ, Packer M, Silver MA, Stevenson LW. ACC/AHA guidelines for the evaluation and management of chronic heart failure in the adult: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Heart Failure). J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;38:2101–13.53The American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association make every effort to avoid any actual or potential conflicts of interest that may arise as a result of an outside relationship or a personal, professional, or business interest of a member of the writing panel. Specifically, all members of the writing group are required to provide disclosure statements of all such relationships that might be perceived as real or potential conflicts of interest. These statements are reviewed by the parent task force, reported orally to all members of the writing panel at the first meeting, and updated as changes occur.54This document, as well as the corresponding full-text guidelines, is available on the World Wide Web sites of the American College of Cardiology (www.acc.org) and the American Heart Association (www.americanheart.org). Single reprints of the executive summary are available for $5.00 each by calling 800-253-4636 (US only) or writing the American College of Cardiology, Educational Services, 9111 Old Georgetown Road, Bethesda, MD 20814-1699. To purchase additional reprints up to 999 copies, call 800-611-6083 (US only) or fax 413-665-2671; 1000 or more copies, call 214-706-1466, fax 214-691-6342, or e-mail pubauth@heart.org (specify version: Executive Summary—71-0125; Full Text—71-1026).55© 2001 American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association, Inc. [O] . Hunt Sharon A, Baker David W, Chin Marshall H, 2001

机译：ACC / AHA成人慢性心力衰竭评估和管理指南：执行摘要美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组的报告（委员会修订1995年心脏评估和管理指南与美国心力衰竭学会认可的国际心脏和肺移植协会合作51）该文件于2001年11月获得美国心脏病学会理事会的批准，并于2001年9月获得美国心脏协会科学咨询和协调委员会的批准.52引用本文件时，美国心脏病学会和美国心脏协会将赞赏以下引用格式：Hunt SA，Baker DW，Chin MH，Cinquegrani MP，Feldman AM，Francis GS，Ganiats TG，Goldstein S，Gregoratos G，Jessup ML，Noble RJ，Packer M，Silver MA，Stevenson LW。 ACC / AHA成人慢性心力衰竭评估和管理指南：摘要：美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组的报告（修订1995年《美国心脏病学会评估和管理指南》的委员会心脏衰竭）。 J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 38：2101–13.53美国心脏病学会和美国心脏协会竭尽全力避免由于外部关系或个人，专业或其他原因而引起的任何实际或潜在的利益冲突。写作小组成员的商业利益。具体而言，要求写作小组的所有成员提供所有可能被视为实际或潜在利益冲突的关系的披露声明。这些声明由上级工作组审查，在第一次会议上口头报告给写作小组的所有成员，并在发生变化时进行更新。54本文档以及相应的全文指南可在万维网上找到。美国心脏病学院（www.acc.org）和美国心脏协会（www.americanheart.org）的网站。致电800-253-4636（仅适用于美国）或写信给美国心脏病，教育服务学院，地址为9111 Old Georgetown Road，Bethesda，MD 20814-1699，可以执行摘要的单个重印本，每张5.00美元。要购买最多999份的其他重印本，请致电800-611-6083（仅限美国）或传真413-665-2671； 1000或更多副本，请致电214-706-1466，传真214-691-6342或电子邮件pubauth@heart.org（指定版本：执行摘要-71-0125；全文-71-1026）。55©2001美国心脏病学会和美国心脏协会有限公司

Text format written questions evaluation Methodology

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅