首页> 外文会议>Hydrovision International Conference and Exhibition >SPILLWAY CAPACITY AND DISCHARGE UNCERTAINTY – WHY DO RATING CURVES RARELY AGREE WITH FLOW MEASUREMENT RECORDS?
【24h】

SPILLWAY CAPACITY AND DISCHARGE UNCERTAINTY – WHY DO RATING CURVES RARELY AGREE WITH FLOW MEASUREMENT RECORDS?

机译:溢洪道容量和放电不确定性 - 为什么评级曲线很少与流量测量记录同意?

获取原文

摘要

Why do spillway rating curves differ from flow measurement studies or gage data? Why do rating curves often have 25% error at normal gate openings but 2% error at flood discharges? Understanding measurement uncertainty can answer these questions. This presentation compiles first-hand studies of Hells Canyon Dam, Wanapum Dam, Castlerock Dam, Petenwell Dam, and other dams. After serving as the shop manager for a university research laboratory and later transitioning to an engineering consultant, the author contends that dam owners seeking to understand rating curve discrepancies must first understand measurement uncertainty and where their rating curve originated.
机译:为什么溢洪道额定曲线与流量测量研究或量具数据不同? 为什么评级曲线通常在普通栅极开口时具有25%的错误,但洪水放电的2%错误? 了解测量不确定性可以回答这些问题。 本演示文稿编制了地狱峡谷大坝,瓦帕曼大坝,卡斯勒克坝,宠物坝等水坝的第一手研究。 作为大学研究实验室的店员经理和后来转向工程顾问之后,该作者认为,寻求理解评级曲线差异的大坝所有者必须首先了解测量不确定性,并在其评级曲线起源的地方。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号