首页> 外文会议>The Minerals, Metals Materials Society Annual Meeting Exhibition >Onset of Void Coalescence Studied by X-ray Computed Tomography
【24h】

Onset of Void Coalescence Studied by X-ray Computed Tomography

机译:通过X射线计算断层扫描研究的空隙聚结的发作

获取原文

摘要

The void growth and coalescence in model materials involving a pre-existing three dimensional void array (i.e. multiple layers of a void array) was studied by X-ray computed tomography (XCT) coupled with in situ tensile deformation. To reduce the recording time, a new technique called fast tomography was employed. The model materials used in this paper were fabricated by the combination of an ultra-short pulsed laser machining system and a diffusion bonding technique, and two different types of arrays were prepared namely, FCC 1 and FCC 2 type array. This methodology allowed the authors to capture the entire process of growth and coalescence events of a void array embedded in the metal matrix. The failures in the both materials involved internal necking and shear localization. One of the highlights of this paper is that the plastic strain at the onset of void coalescence was measured for each model material. These values are in fact the adequate values to be compared with the coalescence strain predicted by existing void coalescence models such as the Brown and Embury model, the Thomason model and the Pardoen and Hutchinson model. The comparison suggested that the Brown and Embury model underestimated the coalescence in neither of the current model materials, while the Thomason model and the Pardoen and Hutchinson model showed a quite good agreement with the result for FCC 1 material. On the other hand the result from FCC 2 material agreed with none of the models probably due to the geometry of the void array that is not compatible with the existing models.
机译:空隙的生长和聚结在涉及预先存在的三维空隙阵列(即多个空隙阵列的层)模型材料用原位拉伸变形加上X射线计算机断层扫描(XCT)研究。为了减少录制时间,采用了一种新的技术,称为快速分析。本文中使用的模型材料通过超短脉冲激光加工系统和扩散键合技术的组合来制造,并且制备了两种不同类型的阵列,即FCC 1和FCC 2型阵列。该方法允许作者捕获嵌入金属基质中的空隙阵列的整个过程和聚结事件。两种材料中的故障涉及内部缩颈和剪切定位。本文的一个亮点是测量每个模型材料测量空隙聚结的塑性应变。事实上,这些值实际上是足够的值与现有的空隙聚结型模型(如棕色和牧草模型),托马逊模型和Pardoen和Hutchinson模型等所预测的聚结会进行比较。比较表明,棕色和饲养模型既不低估了当前模型材料的聚结,而托马逊模型和Pardoen和Hutchinson模型则与FCC 1材料的结果表明相当愉快。另一方面,FCC 2材料的结果与没有任何模型同意,可能是由于与现有模型不兼容的空隙阵列的几何形状。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号