首页> 外文会议>ASSE Professional Development Confernece >The Safety Profession The Challenge for The Future (Or the more that things change - the more that they same the same)
【24h】

The Safety Profession The Challenge for The Future (Or the more that things change - the more that they same the same)

机译:安全职业对未来的挑战(或者更改的事情越改 - 它们也是一样的)

获取原文

摘要

Are we the strongest profession? Are we going to survive in this ever changing world of business? Is our message confused or can we seek to find someway of moving the our aims and objectives forward? All relevant questions that I will seek to answer within this paper, I would however contend that we must be responsive that change or as a profession we shall become irrelevant. Change however does not mean abandoning our core values or beliefs, once those are truly identified and understood. It does mean however being adaptable, forward thinking and willing to take on new and exciting challenges. It is useful to ensure that a working definition is made of the term 'safety.' Frank Bird and George Germain, (Practical Loss Control Management 1985), defined safety as being; The Control of Accidental Loss. Such a definition allows for a premise that a safety professional is therefore an individual that is working to control or reduce accident (or unplanned) loss to his employers business. This definition now some twenty plus years old still struggles to be embraced by many safety professionals. Many still believe that we have some altruistic higher calling, to save the employees engaged in the world of work from pain and suffering. As laudable as that may be, in our current and future working environments this is not a justification for undertaking our specific function or even part thereof. As a profession we must embrace the concept of 'safety' being a function of controlling the loss to our employing businesses.
机译:我们是最强大的职业吗?我们是否会在这个不断变化的业务世界中生存?我们的消息是否混淆,或者我们可以寻求一些移动我们的目标和目标的令人困惑吗?我将寻求在本文中回答的所有相关问题,但是,我们必须响应变革或作为一个职业,我们将变得无关紧要。然而,一旦那些真正识别和理解,改变并不意味着放弃我们的核心价值观或信仰。然而,它确实是适应的,前瞻性思考和愿意接受新的和令人兴奋的挑战。确保工作定义是有用的,以确保由术语“安全性”。弗兰克鸟和乔治格林(实际亏损控制管理1985年),定义了安全性;控制意外损失。这样的定义允许一个前提是安全专业人员是一个人正在努力控制或减少雇主业务的事故(或计划或计划)的损失。这个定义现在,大约二十多年仍然努力被许多安全专业人士接受。许多人仍然相信我们有一些利他较高的呼唤,以拯救从​​事痛苦和痛苦的工作的员工。对于可能的是,在我们当前和未来的工作环境中,这不是承担特定功能甚至其部分的理由。作为一个职业,我们必须拥抱“安全”的概念,是控制损失对我们的雇佣业务的函数。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号