首页> 外文会议>Symposium on Tinkering >Tinkering: a conceptual and historical evaluation
【24h】

Tinkering: a conceptual and historical evaluation

机译:修补:概念和历史评估

获取原文

摘要

Abstract Francois Jacob's article 'Evolution and Tinkering' published in Science in 1977 is still the locus classicus for the concept of tinkering in biology. It first introduced the notion of tinkering to a wide audience of scientists. Jacob drew on a variety of different sources ranging from molecular biology to evolutionary biology and cultural anthropology. The notion of tinkering, or more accurately, the concept of bricolage, are conceptual abstractions that allow for the theoretical analysis of a wide range of phenomena that are united by a shared underlying process-tinkering, or the opportunistic rearrangement and recombination of existing elements. This paper looks at Jacob's analysis as itself an example of conceptual tinkering. It traces the history of some of its elements and sketches how it has become part of an inclusive discourse of theoretical biology and evolutionary developmental biology that emerged over the last 30 years. I will argue that the theoretical power of Jacob's analysis lies in the fact that he captured a widespread phenomenon. His conceptual analysis is thus an example of an interdisciplinary synthesis that is based on a shared process rather than a shared object.
机译:摘要Francois Jacob在1977年在科学中发表的“进化和修补”仍然是生物学修补概念的基因士典范。它首先介绍了对科学家们的广泛观众进行修补的概念。雅各布在分子生物学到进化生物学和文化人类学的各种不同来源。修补或更准确地是古代纹理的概念,是概念性的抽象,允许对广泛现象的理论分析,这些现象是共同的底层过程滋补化,或者现有元素的机会重新排列和重组。本文介绍了雅各的分析,本身是概念修补的例子。它追溯了一些元素的历史,以及草图如何成为过去30年中出现的理论生物学和进化发展生物学的包容性话语的一部分。我会争辩说,雅各的分析的理论力量在于他捕获了普遍存存的现象。因此,他的概念分析是基于共享过程而不是共享对象的跨学科综合的示例。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号