首页> 外文会议>ASEE Annual Conference Exposition >EXPANDING UNDERSTANDING OF FIRST-YEAR ENGINEERING STUDENT RETENTION AND TEAM EFFECTIVENESS THROUGH SOCIAL STYLES ASSESSMENT
【24h】

EXPANDING UNDERSTANDING OF FIRST-YEAR ENGINEERING STUDENT RETENTION AND TEAM EFFECTIVENESS THROUGH SOCIAL STYLES ASSESSMENT

机译:通过社会风格评估扩大对第一年工程学生保留和团队效益的理解

获取原文

摘要

The retention of first-year engineering students and the development of their teamwork skills are both important concerns in engineering education. Factors that have been found to help predict retention and success in teams are student characteristics known as "style" (e.g., learning style, cognitive style). One criticism of these types of assessment is that they are potentially inaccurate due to their self-reporting format. The authors seek to deepen understanding of the relationship between student style, retention and team effectiveness through peer assessments of students' social styles. To that end, social style assessment and team training are discussed within the context of a first-year engineering projects course. Student retention of assessed students is also tracked into their third semester. Previous engineering education research on style has focused primarily on learning style and cognitive style with applications in team development, student retention and the integration of teaching and learning. For example, Jouaneh reports on a study performed over a four-year period in which the performance of undergraduate mechanical engineering students on team projects was correlated with their learning styles as measured by the Brain Dominance Model. Similarly, Ivy and colleagues examined the correlation between learning style and attrition in the first year. Jablokow and Parker describe an investigation of the relationships between the cognitive style of undergraduate engineering students and learning preferences in the classroom.
机译:第一年工程学生的保留以及其团队合作技能的发展是工程教育的重要关注。已经发现有助于预测团队的保留和成功的因素是称为“风格”(例如,学习风格,认知风格)的学生特征。对这些类型评估的批评是由于他们的自我报告格式可能不准确。作者旨在通过同行评估学生的社会风格来加深对学生风格,保留和团队效益之间的关系。为此,在第一年工程项目课程的背景下讨论了社会风格评估和团队培训。学生保留评估的学生也被追溯到他们的第三学期。以前的工程教育研究风格主要集中在学习风格和认知风格与团队发展,学生保留和教学和学习的整合。例如,Jouaneh关于一项研究的报告,在为期四年内进行的,其中本科机械工程学生对团队项目的表现与脑主导地位模型测量的学习方式相关。同样,常春藤和同事在第一年审查了学习风格与消磨之间的相关性。 Jablokow和Parker描述了对本科工程学生认知风格与教室学习偏好关系的调查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号