首页> 外文会议>American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition >Reconstructing and Deconstructing Engineering Education: Tools to Interpret Engineering Philosophies
【24h】

Reconstructing and Deconstructing Engineering Education: Tools to Interpret Engineering Philosophies

机译:重建和解构工程教育:解释工程哲学的工具

获取原文

摘要

With the recent deluge of attempts at forming a more coherent and aligned philosophy of engineering education, a demand for an application of traditional continental methods should be apparent. Even the definition of the field itself is available for scrutiny, and within that framework, a number of interesting paradigms can be discussed. This paper intends to apply approaches from Heidegger's works on metaphysics compared to modern engineering education philosophies. These approaches include interpretations of commonly used words, the intentionality of various constructs within the field, and to whom these constructs affect. The main core of this discussion on Heidegger revolves around the lesser-expanded constructs of false thinking and Bodenstandigkeit or autochthony - sometimes called groundedness. These two constructs can be readily applied to the enterprise of engineering education to better situate the engineer in the world and to discuss his place relative to his role in society, his job, his colleagues, and related institutions. While there are many tools to evaluate engineering thinking and even emergent ones to evaluate divergent and creative thought, tools to evaluate the lack of thinking or thoughtlessness are not pervasive. Heidegger's philosophy provides reflections to better understand false thinking, grounded thought, and potentially a construct for delimiting thought or thoughtlessness - three constructs from which our modern technological literature could benefit. Lastly, of key importance to the future of the field of philosophy of engineering education is its self-expression, not to be confused with the often-used term agency. In one sense, engineering education can be expressed from the vantage point of engineers and educators and their respective communities, and the community efforts must be addressed to fully understand the definition of engineering education. It should be understood that the lens used to study both engineering and education in terms of a philosophy such as Heidegger's is fundamentally a lens of abstraction focused on the self, thus can be of key importance to our community. After discussing several components of Heidegger's philosophy, his constructs are tied to recent publications.
机译:随着最近洪水的洪水在形成更加连贯和对齐的工程教育哲学方面,对传统大陆方法的应用需求应该是显而易见的。即使是该领域本身的定义也适用于审查,并且在该框架内,可以讨论许多有趣的范例。与现代工程教育哲学相比,本文打算施加海德格尔工程的方法。这些方法包括常用词语的解释,领域内各种构建体的意向性,以及这些构建体影响的人。本次讨论关于海德格尔的主要核心围绕着较为扩展的虚假思维和Bodentaltig itit或autochthony的构建 - 有时被称为纳税。这两种结构可以容易地应用于工程教育的企业,以更好地占据世界工程师,并与他在社会,工作,他的同事和相关机构中的角色讨论他的位置。虽然有许多工具来评估工程思维甚至紧急的工具来评估发散和创造性的思想,评估缺乏思维或思维的工具并不普遍存在。海德格尔的哲学提供了更好地理解虚假思维,接地的思想和潜在的思想或思想的构建的思考 - 我们现代技术文学可能受益的三个建筑。最后,对工程教育哲学领域未来的重视是其自我表达,不与经常使用的术语机构混淆。从一种感觉中,工程教育可以从工程师和教育工作者的有利点和各自的社区中表达,必须解决社区的努力,以充分了解工程教育的定义。应当理解,镜头用于研究工程和教育的哲学,如海德格格的哲学,从根本​​上是一个专注于自我的抽象镜头,因此可能对我们的社区重视。在讨论Heidegger哲学的几个组成部分之后,他的建筑与最近的出版物联系在一起。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号