首页> 外文会议>Belgian e-Health Conference >Quality of Care Assessment using GPs' Electronic Patient Records: Do We Need Data from Home Visits?
【24h】

Quality of Care Assessment using GPs' Electronic Patient Records: Do We Need Data from Home Visits?

机译:使用GPS的电子患者记录进行护理评估质量:我们是否需要来自家庭访问的数据?

获取原文

摘要

The paper tackles the topic of collecting data from home visits using the electronic patient record (EPR) of general practitioners (GPs), in a context with a high proportion of home visits in primary care. Since data from home visits, representing about 40% of GPs' consultations in Belgium, are rather scarcely recorded in the EPR, we wanted to study the impact of not taking into account home visits for quality assessment in primary care, Five quality indicators, which measured the accordance of the delivered care with guidelines on the management of osteoarthritis, were compared between a pooled database (consultations and home visits) and a restricted database (after removal of home visits). Our findings suggest that removing home visits from a database collected from primary care may provide a slight modification of the estimate of the quality of care, whereas conclusions on quality improvement remain relatively stable. Quality of care assessment with the EPR of GPs seems not to be dramatically hampered by the poor recording rate of home visits in the EPR.
机译:该论文使用一般从业者(GPS)的电子患者记录(EPR)在家庭访问中收集数据的主题,在初级保健中高比例的家庭访问中的背景下。由于家庭访问的数据,代表比利时GPS磋商的约40%,在EPR中仍然略微录制,我们希望研究没有考虑在初级保健中的质量评估的家庭访问,五项质量指标的影响在汇总的数据库(咨询和家庭访问)和受限制的数据库之间进行了根据骨关节炎管理指南,衡量了根据骨关节炎管理的指导方针(删除家庭访问后)。我们的研究结果表明,从初级保健收集的数据库中删除家庭访问可能会略有修改护理质量的估计,而质量改善的结论保持相对稳定。随着GPS的epr的护理质量评估似乎不受EPR中家庭访问的差价差的差异急剧妨碍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号