首页> 外文会议>Center for Chemical Process Safety International Conference >Common Process Safety Management Gaps Based on Occupational Safety and Health Administration Process Safety Management of Highly Hazardous Chemicals Violation Trends
【24h】

Common Process Safety Management Gaps Based on Occupational Safety and Health Administration Process Safety Management of Highly Hazardous Chemicals Violation Trends

机译:基于职业安全和健康管理流程的普通过程安全管理差距高度危险的化学品违规趋势

获取原文

摘要

On July 17,1990 the U.S.Occupational Safety and Health Administration(OSHA)published in the Federal Register the proposed standard Process Safety Management(PSM)of Highly Hazardous Chemicals(HHCs).Approximately four months later it was enacted into law via Clean Air Act Amendments(CAAA).These amendments require that the U.S.Secretary of Labor,in coordination with the U.S.Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency,promulgate,pursuant to the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970,a chemical process safety standard to prevent accidental releases of chemicals that could pose a threat to employees [1].The full text of the final standard was issued in the Federal Register on February 24,1992.The OSHA standard is listed under Title 29(Department of Labor)of the Code of Federal Regulations(CFR)as 1910.119.This standard leans towards a performance-based guidance document that outlines methods and programs to decrease the likelihood of flammable,toxic,reactive and explosive chemical releases.The intent is to reduce the risk to employees,visitors and contractors that may enter or work at chemical processing facilities.Facilities are subject to the PSM regulation if they hold a threshold quantity of any HHC that is listed in Appendix A of the standard,with some exceptions.The violations that OSHA issues for the 1910.119 standard will cite the specific element and its relevant subsection.Published data allows for review of the violations,and based on that information an indication of common PSM program gaps can be assessed.A ten-year span of OSHA PSM violation data was examined(2007-2017).The data shows the top four OSHA cited PSM sections(often referred to as elements)are(highest to lowest): 1)Process Safety Information 2)Mechanical Integrity 3)Operating Procedures 4)Process Hazard Analysis Each of these elements have known solutions,and specific corrective actions can be easily implemented given the lessons learned,the current level of expertise that exists in the process safety industry and the cost-effective software tools that are now available.Regulatory compliance is not the only goal of adequate PSM programs,nor is it the goal of this review.The purpose of reviewing the OSHA violation information is not meant to help facilities avoid OSHA citations,but to uncover gaps found by OSHA and bring awareness and attention to some common issues,hopefully leading to focused solutions for safer,more reliable facilities.
机译:7月17日7月17日,在联邦登记册上发表的Usocupational安全和健康管理局(OSHA)拟议的高度危险化学品(HHCS)的标准过程安全管理(PSM)。超值四个月后,它通过Clean Air法案颁布了法律修正案(CAAA)。这些修正案要求劳工的劳动力协调与环境保护署的usadministor协调,颁布,根据1970年的职业安全和卫生法,是一种防止意外释放的化学工艺安全标准可能对员工构成威胁的化学品[1]。最终标准的全文于2月24日在联邦登记册上发布。OSHA标准列于联邦法规守则的第29号(劳工部)下列出(CFR)为1910.119.该标准倾向于基于绩效的指导文件,概述了减少易燃,有毒,反应性和爆炸性化学的可能性的方法和计划l释放。意图是为了减少可以在化学加工设施进入或工作的员工,访客和承包商的风险。如果他们持有附录A中列出的任何HHC的门槛数量,则须遵守PSM监管标准,具有一些例外。违反1910.119标准的OSHA问题将引用特定的要素及其相关款。发布数据允许审查违规行为,并根据该信息进行评估符合普通PSM计划差距的信息。审查了十年的OSHA PSM违规数据(2007-2017)。数据显示了前四个OSHA引用的PSM部分(通常称为元素)(最高到最低):1)过程安全信息2)机械完整性3)操作程序4)过程危险分析这些元素的每个元素具有已知的解决方案,并且可以轻松地实现特定的纠正措施,并且在经验教训中,目前存在的专业水平E过程安全行业和现在可用的经济高效的软件工具。提高遵从性不是足够的PSM计划的唯一目标,也不是本评论的目标。审查OSHA违规信息的目的并不意味着帮助设施避免OSHA引文,但要突出OSHA发现的差距,并为某些常见问题带来了意识和关注,希望能够为更安全,更可靠的设施提供专注的解决方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号