首页> 外文会议>Western Decision Sciences Institute Annual Meeting >Do Our Teaching Methods Agree with How We Believe Classes Should Be Taught? Faculty and Student Perspectives of Younger and Older Accounting Students
【24h】

Do Our Teaching Methods Agree with How We Believe Classes Should Be Taught? Faculty and Student Perspectives of Younger and Older Accounting Students

机译:我们的教学方法是否同意我们如何教授课程?年轻人和老年会计学生的教师视角

获取原文

摘要

This paper compares accounting education for traditional and nontraditional students. Thirty accounting faculty were interviewed and 54 accounting students were queried. For traditional students faculty preferred: methods intended to hold students' interests, group work, learning how to learn, active participation, and unstructured problem solving, whereas for nontraditional students faculty preferred the same methods, except exactly reversed. These were not the methods faculty used. Traditional students preferred: feedback solicitation, interesting classes, teaching to examination, and structured problems. Nontraditional student preferences were similar, except they preferred: active participation, and increasing self-expectation/esteem. Traditional students didn't like: competition, unstructured problems, and reflection; nontraditional students didn't like competition, and insufficient coverage.
机译:本文比较了传统和非传统学生的会计教育。采访了三十个会计师,询问了54名会计学生。对于传统的学生教师首选:旨在掌握学生的利益,集团工作,学习如何学习,积极参与和非结构化问题解决的方法,而对于非传统学生的教师优先于相同的方法,除了完全逆转。这些不是使用的方法。传统学生首选:反馈征求,有趣的课程,教学考试,以及结构性问题。非传统学生偏好是相似的,除了他们首选:积极参与,增加自我期望/尊重。传统学生不喜欢:竞争,非结构化的问题和反思;非传统学生不喜欢竞争,覆盖不足。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号